| News
Stories: |
 |
Click-on
these handy "jump links" to quickly access the news item you're
looking for.
1.
Harbour planning 'needs big shake-up'
1. Harbour planning 'needs big shake-up'
ANDY
CHENG, SCMP 14 January 2005
A
leading business advisory council has floated a concept to develop
1,800 hectares of Victoria Harbour frontage, saying much of it is
badly used.
Paul
Zimmerman, of the Business Environment Council, told a meeting of
the Harbour-Front Enhancement Committee of the idea of "integrated
harbour planning" for a "Victoria Harbour District".
The
council, a non-profit organisation advising businesses on sustainable
development, counts among its members Sun Hung Kai Properties and
Sino Land Company, shortlisted bidders for the West Kowloon cultural
hub.
Mr
Zimmerman said specifying use would ensure land was better used
and the proposal was prompted by the lack of land in the city.
"We
only know there is a plan for West Kowloon, we know somebody has
a plan for a heliport, we know somebody has a plan for a Central
reclamation. But what we don't have is a plan for the area as a
whole," he said.
"Look
at the East Island corridor, it's a badly used coastline ... The
ferry terminals from the Central ferry piers ... people have to
walk a long way to the pier and that's it, there is nothing else.
"It's just all roads. You could sit in a restaurant on top
of the ferry pier. If we develop it nicely, there are lots of things
that we can do."
Mr
Zimmerman said there was a need to have a new government body in
charge of the overall development of the coastlines. He said 600
hectares of coastal land was available for development.
Under
the plan, the Victoria Harbour district would include a sports stadium,
museums, hotels, heliports, ferry terminals, green areas, a zoo
and hospital.
It
also seeks to expand the public's access with piazzas and promenades,
waterfront restaurants, and expanded use of water taxis. The area
runs from Tsing Yi Lei Yue Mun.
The
council estimated 50,000 jobs could be created and $500 billion
could be gained from land sales under the development.
But
the proposal was not well-received by the committee.
Chairman
Lee Chack-fan described it as creative and academic but requiring
the time and effort of a feasibility study. Chief town planner Raymond
Wong Wai-man said the plan was risky, adding that the existing development
involved district-level development and historical influence.
Director
of Planning Bosco Fung Chee-keung said the development should be
a step-by-step approach and the council's proposal was too radical.
But
Friends of the Earth director Mei Ng Fong Siu-mei said it could
start a debate on the planning of the harbour-front development.
|