| News
Stories: |
 |
Click-on
these handy "jump links" to quickly access the news item you're
looking for.
1.
Public to get final say on Wan Chai
bypass
2.
Culture-hub idea is under fire
3.
We were kept in the dark: harbour advisers
4.
Cartoon
1. Public to get final say on Wan Chai bypass
Paris
Lord, The Standard 25 January 2005
Government
officials will today attempt to counter Monday's media reports that
pictures released by the Harborfront Enhancement Committee (HEC)
showing routes for the Central-Wan Chai bypass were "options''.
The
government says they were simply suggestions aimed at encouraging
public discussion.
A
special meeting of the sub-committee on Wan Chai development Phase
II held on Monday night agreed to clarify news reports that the
public has to choose from the three ``options'', with reclamation
required for the road ranging from 10 hectares to 25 hectares.
A
public consultation process also kicked off at the Sunday press
conference.
Unusually
for a public consultation being led by the enhancement committee,
ideas were merely being floated. None of them will be implemented
unless the public agrees, according to panel member Nicholas Brooke.
There
are no preconceived ideas about what Wan Chai's land use and infrastructure
needs should be, he said. It is up to the community to suggest ideas.
Brooke
said sub-committee mem-bers realize the need to clarify their message
so the community understands it is they who will have the final
say.
A
furious fellow sub-committee member, Paul Zimmerman, sent an e-mail
from Europe to say the government's documents showing the routes
do not represent the meaning, purpose or intent of the sub-committee's
review of Wan Chai and adjoining areas.
``This
document is a [Wan Chai phase II] reclamation [and] tunnel alignment
engineering review document - precisely and entirely the opposite
of what the membership of [the enhancement committee] has been recommending,''
Zimmerman said.
Because
much of the surface traffic will be created by developments planned
in Central, the government pictures of Wan Chai and adjoining areas
are supposed to include Central - but they do not.
``We
have urged an open and inclusive debate about transport in general
for Wan Chai and Central ... to incorporate public concerns whether
traffic demand management measures such as electronic road pricing,
alternative modes of transport, and redesign of surface roads have
been taken well into account,'' Zimmerman said.
Brooke
said it had been a misunderstanding, and that the three pictures
are not ``options'' for the bypass.
``They're
purely by way of illustration,'' he said of newspaper pictures suggesting
the routes could go underground or above ground. They are ``designed
to provoke discussion, debate, and hopefully perhaps get innovative
ideas from the community in terms of what other ways there might
be of solving this particular traffic issue,'' Brooke added.
``As
an HEC and indeed as sub-groups, we've got to learn perhaps to deal
with the media better.
``We've
got to make sure the messages we're trying to get across do get
across.''
A
spokeswoman for the comm-ittee's secretariat said the purpose of
the pictures is to give sub-committee members ideas of how the Wan
Chai routes might look, because the government has to show sub-committee
members something.
The
routes are ``a concept, not a proposal,'' she said, adding they
were ``very preliminary.''
2. Culture-hub idea is under fire
ANDY
CHENG, SCMP 25 January 2005
The
piecemeal development approach to the West Kowloon cultural project
proposed by the Institute of Architects has many drawbacks, including
a lack of continuity, a shortlisted bidder says.
Henderson
Land vice-chairman Colin Lam Ko-yin said if the arts and cultural
facilities were developed separately, "they will be difficult
to manage".
The
institute last week called for the site to be developed in phases
under different tenders to ensure it catered for changing cultural
needs.
Mr
Lam said another concern was the huge canopy planned to cover the
site.
"The
canopy cannot be built piece by piece because of its necessary foundations.
Splitting its construction will cause safety problems. Other problems
include responsibility for and maintenance of the canopy."
Henderson
subsidiary World Culture Park is one of the three shortlisted bidders.
The others are Dynamic Star International, a joint venture by Cheung
Kong (Holdings) and Sun Hung Kai Properties; and Sunny Development,
a consortium between Sino Land, Wharf (Holdings) and Chinese Estates
Holdings.
A
Dynamic Star International spokesman said it was open-minded about
the tendering approach.
A
Sunny Development spokeswoman said it needed to study the institute's
proposal in detail.
Mr
Lam said he was not concerned that the creation of a Legco subcommittee
on the West Kowloon project - as proposed by lawmaker Alan Leong
Kah-kit last week - would delay the project.
"If
they [legislators] think there is a need to set up a panel, they
should do it ... more debates will make things clearer."
3. We were kept in the dark: harbour advisers
CHLOE
LAI, SCMP 25 January 2005
The
government was accused yesterday of manipulating its harbour advisory
body by releasing new Wan Chai reclamation plans in the group's
name without briefing its members.
Members
of the Harbourfront Enhancement Committee were advised by e-mail
just hours before the latest proposals to reclaim up to 25 hectares
on the Wan Chai waterfront were revealed on Sunday.
They
were told to check a government website for the details, which had
not been discussed at any committee meeting.
Angry
members of the committee - set up last year with the stated aim
of involving the community in decisions about the harbour - held
a crisis meeting last night with government officials over the release.
The
Business Environment Council's representative on the committee,
Paul Zimmerman, said he had been shocked by the news.
"We
were unaware of the plans until very late. They weren't presented
either at any of the committee or subcommittee meetings," said
Mr Zimmerman, who is also convenor of the Designing Hong Kong Harbour
District group.
The
plans were released on Sunday by Leung Kong-yui, chairman of the
committee's Wan Chai development subcommittee.
Christine
Loh Kung-wai, chairwoman of the Society for Protection of the Harbour
and a committee member, said members knew nothing about the concept
plans.
"It
appears the government has manipulated the subcommittee. The plans
were ... announced on Sunday so critical voices would find it hard
to respond swiftly."
Mr
Leung said it was a misunderstanding and he did not feel manipulated
by the government.
He
said he was briefed by the government a few days ago about the three
options for reclamation.
"What
we released were just some technical data, which will not derail
the process of engaging public opinion. The plans are aimed at stimulating
public discussion," said Mr Leung, who represents the Chartered
Institute of Logistics and Transport, Hong Kong.
It
is understood the full committee had only discussed in principle
how the reclamation could proceed and how the public should be consulted.
Mr Leung told the full committee at a meeting last Thursday that
an "information kit" would be made public on Sunday, without
mentioning the concept plans.
The
government's three proposals, to reclaim between 10 and 25 hectares
of land, include options to build a tunnel, elevated road or surface
highway along the waterfront to ease traffic congestion. The biggest
reclamation proposed is just one hectare less than the plan that
was quashed by the Court of Final Appeal last year.
"These
concept plans showed the government is determined to reclaim Victoria
Harbour in order to sell land for commercial purposes," Ms
Loh said.
The
concept plans did not appear to have considered the Court of Final
Appeal ruling that any reclamation must abide by the "overriding
public needs" principle, she added.
Secretary
for Housing, Planning and Land Michael Suen Ming-yeung said the
plans were preliminary ideas and would not necessarily be chosen
by the government.
After
last night's meeting, Mr Leung said the committee would hold a press
conference soon to explain the matter.
Chaired
by civil engineering professor Lee Chack-fan, the Harbour Enhancement
Committee comprises six senior government officials and 23 members
of green groups, business groups, interest groups and individuals.
4. Cartoon
SCMP
25 January 2005

|