| News
Stories: |
 |
Click-on
these handy "jump links" to quickly access the news item you're
looking for.
1.
CII-HK Research Study of Feasibility
of Establishing Construction Standards for Hong Kong
2.
Construction output for fourth quarter
and whole year of 2003
3.
Government to declare Morrison Building
a monument
4.
Downturn in building projects continues
5.
The battle to oust Green Island
6.
Harbour row redress may total $100m
7.
Developers to build luxury flats on
estate they bought for knock-down price
8.
Morrison Building to be declared official
monument
9.
Harbour delays ‘have cost up
to $100m’
1. CII-HK Research Study of Feasibility of Establishing Construction
Standards for Hong Kong
CII-HK
Press Release, 19 March 2004
The
Construction Industry Institute (Hong Kong (CII-HK) has launched
it research study on the subject of construction standards in Hong
Kong. The study is the third major study project undertaken by the
CII-HK, following the study on partnering practices (which has just
been completed and the full report of which is expected to be put
to print in April) and the study on environmentally healthy buildings
(which is scheduled for completion in September). The study is commissioned
to the Research Team of the City University of Hong Kong. Study
work has commenced in January and is expected to take twelve months.
A special task force, headed by Mr Michael Arnold and comprising
representatives from CII-HK’s member companies, covering a
wide spectrum of industry sectors, has also been set up within CII-HK
to monitor and oversee the research study.
2.
To signify the importance of the research project and to kick start
major activities of the study, a signing ceremony in respect of
the research agreement is scheduled for 1 April 2004 (Thursday)
at 4:00 pm at the City Unviersity. The CII-HK will be represented
by task force Chairman Mr Michael Arnold. Professor SC Roderick
Wong, Dean of the Faculty of Science and Engineering will represent
the City University of Hong Kong.
3.
The purpose of the research study is to examine the feasibility
of establishing construction standards for Hong Kong. The study
will look at the needs and the problems of the Hong Kong construction
industry with regard to construction standards, taking into account
Hong Kong’s unique economic positioning in relation to the
Mainland China, the UK, other European countries, the USA and countries
in the South Eastern Pacific region. It will look at the possible
direction and will explore the possible way forward, which will
have to be practical and economical for the industry, in the face
of amongst other problems multiplicity of standards.
4.
For the study to be on the proper track and to ensure that the real
need of the industry is gauged, the Research Team has considered
it of paramount importance to seek the views of practicing people
from within the industry. For this, the Research Team is organizing
a focused group workshop on 30 March 2004 (Tuesday) afternoon from
2:00 pm to 5:30 pm at the City University of Hong Kong. The workshop
is targeting a selected representative group (of about 30 to 35)
of senior executives in the industry and senior Government officials.
Researchers from Beijing, Singapore, Australia, the USA and Hong
Kong will introduce standardization practices in different countries
and regions and help facilitate participants’ discussion to
identify local problems. Based on the findings and results of the
workshop, the Research Team will follow up with more focused in-depth
interviews. Additional workshop will also be arranged if considered
necessary. The outcome of this exercise will form the basis of further
study in the next phase. Both the CII-HK and the Research Team are
therefore attaching the greatest importance to this very phase of
research work.
2. Construction output for fourth quarter and whole year of 2003
Hong
Kong Government, 18 March 2004
1.
In 2003, the total gross value of construction work performed by
main contractors decreased by 6.7% in nominal terms compared with
2002 to $98.9 billion, according to the preliminary results of the
Quarterly Survey of Construction Output released today (March 18)
by the Census and Statistics Department.
2.
After discounting price changes, the total gross value of construction
work performed by main contractors decreased by 2.4% in real terms
over the same period.
3.
Gross value of construction work in real terms is derived by deflating
the corresponding nominal value with an appropriate price index
to the 2000 price level.
4.
Analysed by type of construction work, the gross value of construction
work performed at private sector sites totalled $35.1 billion in
2003, representing a decrease of 17.0% in nominal terms from 2002.
In real terms, it decreased by 10.4%. The decrease was mainly due
to completion of work at some large residential building sites.
5.
On the other hand, the gross value of construction work performed
at public sector sites amounted to $32.4 billion in 2003, representing
a slight increase of 0.9% in nominal terms over 2002. In real terms,
it rose by 4.7%. The increase was mainly attributable to an intensification
of work on some public service building projects.
6.
The gross value of construction work performed by contractors at
locations other than construction sites amounted to $31.5 billion
in 2003, representing a slight decrease of 0.6% in nominal terms
compared with 2002. Yet, it increased by 1.0% in real terms. Construction
work at locations other than construction sites includes minor new
construction activities and renovation work at erected buildings
and structures; and electrical and mechanical fitting work at locations
other than construction sites.
7.
Analysed by end-use category, residential building projects accounted
for the largest share in the gross value of construction work performed
at construction sites in 2003. The gross value of construction work
performed for these projects amounted to $28.5 billion, representing
a decrease of 21.9% in nominal terms compared with 2002.
8.
Transport projects constituted the second largest category of construction
site work. The gross value of construction work performed for these
projects totalled $14.1 billion in 2003, representing an increase
of 4.9% in nominal terms over 2002.
9.
Industrial, storage and service building projects represented the
third largest category of construction site work. The gross value
of construction work performed for these projects was $10.2 billion
in 2003, representing an increase of 35.6% in nominal terms over
2002.
10.
Comparing the fourth quarter of 2003 with the fourth quarter of
2002, the gross value of construction work performed by main contractors
decreased by 9.0% in nominal terms. In real terms, the decrease
was 5.7%.
11.
Within this total, the gross value of construction work performed
at private sector sites decreased by 23.7% in nominal terms in the
fourth quarter of 2003 from a year earlier. Yet, the gross value
of construction work performed at public sector sites increased
by 1.8%. The gross value of construction work performed by contractors
at locations other than construction sites increased marginally
by 0.1%.
12.
In real terms, the gross value of construction work performed at
private sector sites decreased by 17.7% in the fourth quarter of
2003 from a year earlier. For public sector sites, the gross value
of construction work increased by 5.3%. The gross value of construction
work performed by contractors at locations other than construction
sites decreased slightly by 0.5%.
13.
On a seasonally adjusted basis, the gross value of construction
work performed by main contractors decreased by 10.3% in nominal
terms or 9.4% in real terms in the fourth quarter of 2003 compared
with the third quarter of 2003.
14.
Table
1 (text
version) and 2
(text
version) show the gross value of construction work performed
by main contractors in the fourth quarter and the whole year of
2003 respectively. Table
3 (text
version) shows the revised figures for the third quarter of
2003.
15.
Owing to the widespread sub-contracting practices in the construction
industry, a construction establishment can be a main contractor
for one contract and a sub-contractor for another contract at the
same time. The gross value of construction work performed by main
contractors covers only those projects in which the construction
establishment takes the role of a main contractor, but not projects
in which it takes only the role of a sub-contractor. However, sub-contractors'
contribution to projects should have been included in the gross
value of construction work performed by main contractors for whom
they worked.
16.
More detailed statistics are given in the "Report on the Quarterly
Survey of Construction Output, 4th Quarter 2003". The report
is now available, in both hardcopy and softcopy (in PDF format),
for sale at HK$12. It can be purchased online at the "Statistical
Bookstore, Hong Kong" (http://www.statisticalbookstore.gov.hk).
For purchase of hardcopy, this can be done through mail order by
returning a completed order form which can be downloaded from the
C&SD's website (http://www.info.gov.hk/censtatd/eng/prod_serv/forms_index.html).
Purchase can also be made in person at the Publications Unit of
the C&SD (Address: 19/F, Wanchai Tower, 12 Harbour Road, Wan
Chai; Tel.: 2582 3025).
17.
For enquiries about the survey results, please contact the Construction
and Miscellaneous Services Statistics Section of the Census and
Statistics Department at telephone no. 2805 6426 or email building@censtatd.gov.hk.
3. Government to declare Morrison Building a monument
Hong
Kong Government, 18 March 2004
The
Secretary for Home Affairs, Dr Patrick Ho, is initiating procedures
to declare the Morrison Building at Hoh Fuk Tong Centre in Tuen
Mun a monument under the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance.
This
follows a recent decision by the Chief Executive in Council to dismiss
the objection lodged by the owner of the building.
The
Morrison Building was originally part of a villa built in 1936 by
General Cai Tingjie (1892-1968), who led the Nineteenth Corps against
the Japanese invasion. From 1946 to 1949, it was turned into the
Dade Institute - a tertiary education institution founded under
the directive of Chinese leaders Zhou Enlai and Dong Biwu. Many
eminent Chinese scholars of the time lectured at the institute,
nurturing a group of bright young intellectuals. The building bears
witness to the unique role played by Hong Kong in the history of
modern China and the establishment of the People's Republic of China.
The
Government has been in discussions with the owner since June 2001
after learning of the owner's intention to redevelop the site in
the hope that a mutually beneficial agreement that could protect
the building as well as enable the owner to carry out any development
proposal could be reached. However, no agreement was reached and
the owner went ahead to apply for a demolition permit on March 1,
2003.
The
building was declared a Proposed Monument on April 11, 2003, a move
that protects it for 12 months against the owner's demolition plan.
The declaration of a Proposed Monument is not renewable on private
land.
On
October 31, 2003, the Secretary for Home Affairs, in his capacity
as the "Antiquities Authority" and on the advice of the
Antiquities Advisory Board, served on the owner a notice of his
intention to declare the building a monument for permanent protection.
The owner then raised an objection to the Chief Executive.
"This
is the first time that a privately owned building to be declared
a monument under the ordinance without the consent of the owner,"
a Government spokesman said.
The
area to be declared is about 1,250 square metres, comprising an
area of about 480 square metres occupied by the building and a peripheral
area of about 770 square metres, which provides access to the building
from the outside of the Hoh Fuk Tong site.
The
declaration will not affect property ownership. The owner has stated
its intention to redevelop the Ho Fuk Tong site.
The
Government spokesman said that because the area to be declared occupied
only a small portion of the intended redevelopment area, the declaration
should not prevent redevelopment in that area altogether.
"The
Government will continue to maintain dialogue with the owner and
render assistance as appropriate," the spokesman said. "The
Government has also offered to bear the restoration and maintenance
costs of the building after the declaration, provided that it will
be open for public visits. There is also provision for the owner
to seek compensation under the ordinance.
"The
Government is committed to protecting important historical buildings,"
he said.
4. Downturn in building projects continues
Danny
Chung, The Standard 19 March 2004
Output
in the construction industry for 2003 continued its downward trend
with a 6.7 per cent slide to HK$98.8 billion, according to government
statistics released yesterday.
The
industry has recorded a drop in output of about 6 per cent on average
every year since 1999.
In
the 1990s, starting in 1993, the industry achieved growth of about
14 per cent on average each year ending in 1997 and thereafter dropping
to only 1.4 per cent growth in 1998.
According
to the Census and Statistics Department, total output in the private
sector for 2003 was HK$35.1 billion, a fall of 17 per cent over
2002, after two years of rises in private sector construction.
The
department said this ``was mainly due to completion of work at some
large residential building sites''.
However,
public sector construction in 2003 continued to hold steady with
a slight increase of 0.9 per cent to HK$32.4 billion over 2002 and
was ``mainly attributable to an intensification of work on some
public service building projects''.
These
include large road projects such as the Deep Bay Link, Route 9,
the Hong Kong-Shenzhen Western Corridor and widening of Yuen Long
Highway for the Highways Department, as well as the second stage
of reclamation at Penny's Bay for the Civil Engineering Department.
These
projects helped offset the decline in workload following the completion
of the Kowloon-Canton Railway Corporation's West Rail and soon to
be completed Ma On Shan rail link.
Minor
work, renovations and building services work recorded a slight increase
of 0.6 per cent to HK$31.5 billion over 2002.
Residential
building work continued to be the largest sector with HK$28.5 billion
of work completed, but this was down 21.2 per cent over the year
before.
Transport
projects came second at HK$14.1 billion, representing a small increase
of 4.9 per cent, while industrial, storage and service buildings
came third at HK$10.2 billion, a jump of 35.6 per cent.
5. The battle to oust Green Island
Danny
Chung, The Standard 19 March 2004
Seashore
residents of the gentrifying Hung Hom area, locked in a squabble
with a decades-old cement plant, say they are fed up with what they
call the government's poor town planning and lack of a definitive
harbour policy.
At
the centre of the affair is Green Island Cement, a unit of Cheung
Kong Infrastructure. Residents say they have been complaining for
11 years that the company has poured out dust and noise pollution
from its Hung Hom pier site.
Over
that period, the area has steadily moved upscale from its original
industrial character to appeal to high-income earners.
According
to a wide variety of critics, who see the entire development of
Hong Kong's harbour as a badly planned affair, the government has
botched the situation.
Certainly,
there seems to be some confusion on the government's part. The Environmental
Protection Department says the plant is doing what its licence says
it can do. The Lands Department earlier said the plant had violated
the terms of its lease and sought to kick Green Island off the site.
Green
Island subsequently sued, contesting the Lands Department's grounds
that it had breached the lease conditions, and demanded compensation
for losses incurred.
The
Office of the Ombudsman has investigated the case and found what
it called maladministration on the Lands Department's part.
The
story began in 1978, when the government leased the pier and the
adjoining industrial site to Green Island Cement for industrial
use for 70 years, until 2048.
Green
Island set up a batching plant to mix cement with water and aggregate
to make concrete. It was an attractive site because barges had a
water route to bring in the massive supplies of material needed
to make the vast amounts of concrete needed for Hong Kong's burgeoning
residential construction.
China
Light and Power and Cheung Kong Holdings, the property company controlled
by tycoon Li Ka-shing, developed Laguna Verde. The residential site
is cheek by jowl with Green Island Cement, which is owned by Cheung
Kong Infrastructure, which is also controlled by Li Ka-shing.
Prompted
by the Laguna Verde residents' continuing protests, the Lands Department
has accused the batching plant of being an illegal development.
It alleges the plant's operations have overflowed onto the pier,
violating the terms of its lease.
Although
the batching plant and the pier have been there for several decades,
the area has clearly outlived its usefulness as an industrial site.
``You
have to understand that this lease was made years ago, and at that
time nobody thought this area would be developed to this extent,''
says district councillor Siu Yuen-sheung, in whose constituency
the cement factory lies. Her constituents, she says, complain incessantly
about dust and noise. ``When they open the windows, a lot of dust
flies in. And when they sweep the floor, there is a layer of dust.''
Neither
Green Island Cement nor Cheung Kong Infrastructure responded to
requests for an interview.
However,
Cheung Kong Infrastructure officials, at a chance meeting with Siu,
said they would move the plant if the government could find another
location for them.
``You
think we don't want to go? They said to us that the government cannot
find land,'' Siu quotes the officials as saying.
It
isn't as easy as it sounds. Siu says Green Island wants land in
a city area, near the sea for easy transport of raw materials, and
close to customers. Concrete starts to harden in about two hours,
so locations on the outer islands are unworkable.
Hung
Hom residents charge that the government is sitting on the issue.
Laguna Verde residents are amongst the most vocal.
``It's
a beautiful place and the facilities are very good, and the management
is very good. It's just that it's not very attractive if you live
over there,'' says Helen Maffini, a Laguna Verde resident. One family
she knows has decamped for the Peninsula Royal development because
of the dust and noise, she says.
Kelvin
Chan, a real estate agent with an office nearby, says noise and
dust have affected flat prices.
``For
phase 3 and 4, with a sea view, prices are discounted by 10 to 15
per cent,'' Chan said. ``People have moved away because of it, but
it isn't the case of only finding out after buying, they knew it
was there before buying.''
Siu
says a series of meetings between Green Island Cement and the Environmental
Protection Department (EDP) to discuss the complaints and mitigation
measures have resulted in no action.
"EDP
is always putting in a good word for them,'' she says. "I don't
know what it is with EDP, always saying `no, no, they're operating
just fine, we cannot give you an answer'.''
The
department has released results from three monitoring stations saying
that the batching plant does not exceed environmental department
pollution levels.
In
addition, Siu says, Green Island has been extremely accommodating
about the complaints and has carried out measures like spraying
down the aggregate with water and delaying opening times to mitigate
dust and noise.
Siu
says the EDP has renewed Green Island's permit to operate the plant
for another five years.
``I
don't know how it was approved in the past,'' she complains. ``In
2001, our documents said we already were unhappy and asked them
to move. But in 2002, they suddenly approved five more years for
them . At the time I was furious, so furious that I thumped the
table.''
The
Environmental Planning Department says Green Island doesn't need
an environmental permit to operate because its silo capacity doesn't
exceed 10,000 tonnes. Below that capacity, batching plants only
require a specified process licence.
The
Environmental Planning Department said all the paperwork is in order
although Michael Suen, the secretary for housing, planning and lands,
said the Lands Department issued warning letters as long ago as
1992 ``requesting compliance with the lease conditions'' because
the batching plant had spilled on to the pier.
Other
observers are more conciliatory.
Raymong
Wong, the chief town planner at the Town Planning Board, simply
points out that economic change and technological advances have
been a factor in changing uses of the waterfront.
And
so the squabble goes on.
6. Harbour row redress may total $100m
Teddy
Ng, The Standard 19 March 2004
Contractors
working on phase three of the Central reclamation project will be
eligible for a maximum HK$100 million in compensation for the five-month
delay caused by a long court battle over the scheme.
However,
Territory Development Department director John Chai said yesterday
that it will not be necessary to seek extra funding from the Legislative
Council to pay for any compensation.
Chai
said that while the planned 55-month project was delayed for five
months by a filing for a judicial review brought by the Society
for the Protection of the Harbour, dredging and other preparatory
works continued.
Chai
said the government is talking to the contractors, a Leighton-China
State-Van Oord joint venture, urging them to resume work as soon
as possible.
They
have been informed by letter of the March 9 Court of First Instance
ruling that the project is legal and can proceed.
The
department's Hong Kong Island and Islands development office project
manager Cheung Tai-yan said
the
government is considering asking the contractor to speed up construction.
Cheung said the contractors had not asked for compensation.
However,
the estimated maximum compensation the government would be liable
for would be HK$100 million and the government would negotiate to
lower that. ``According to the contract, the contractor has the
responsibility to reduce the loss and risk,'' Cheung said.
Meanwhile,
Chai said the reclamation will not be stopped again even if the
Society for the Protection of the Harbour launches an appeal.
Former
society chairman Winston Chu told MetroNews on Wednesday that unless
thousands of people join hands along the waterline between Central
and Wan Chai and show ``genuine'' and ``enthusiastic'' support,
the society will not appeal.
Chai
said: ``I think the reclamation is legal and reasonable. Making
an appeal will not affect the legality of the project.''
He
reiterated that the project's planned area of 18 hectares is the
minimum required for the Central-Wan Chai bypass, the waterfront
promenade and new ferry piers. The government originally planned
a 32-hectare reclamation.
Meanwhile,
Chai said the Territory Development Department and the Civil Engineering
Development Department will merge in mid 2004.
The
Territory Development Department New Territories West and North
development offices would also be merged under the exercise.
In
the merger, 66 posts have been earmarked for deletion, of which
nine are directorate posts.
Three
of these directorate posts are from the Territory Development Department.
However,
Chai said the merger will not lead to lay-offs or redundancies.
It
is estimated that the merger will save the government HK$40 million
annually.
7. Developers to build luxury flats on estate they bought for knock-down
price
DENISE
TSANG, SCMP 19 March 2004
The
controversial Hunghom Peninsula housing estate will be torn down
and replaced with luxury apartments - at a total cost of about $5
billion, the developers announced yesterday.
New
World Development managing director Henry Cheng Kar-shun said its
unit NWS Holdings and Sun Hung Kai Properties would demolish the
waterfront estate and build flats over a gross floor area of 1.55
million sq ft.
The
project looks to be a windfall for the developers, with total costs
estimated at $3,225 per sq ft and the luxury units likely to sell
for about $10,000 per sq ft.
The
developers bought the project back from the government last month
for $2.77 billion, or $1,800 per sq ft, including a land premium
of $864 million.
Lawmakers
attacked the price for being too low and accused the administration
of favouring big developers with the deal.
Mr
Cheng expected the redevelopment to take four years to complete.
"We are hiring an architect to work out a detailed plan and
will then discuss it with the government," he said.
Built
under the now-defunct Private Sector Participation Scheme (PSPS),
Hunghom Peninsula has 2,470 flats and overlooks Victoria Harbour.
It
was one of two completed PSPS projects left in limbo when the government
suspended the sale of government-subsidised housing in November
2002 to prop up the private housing sector.
The
other is the 2,010-unit Kingsford Terrace, jointly owned by NWS,
its parent New World Development and privately run Chow Tai Fook
Enterprises. Chow Tai Fook is New World Development's controlling
shareholder.
Mr
Cheng said the $5 billion development cost included the $864 million
land premium, $1.9 billion in debts and demolition and construction
costs. This means a cost of $3,225 per sq ft.
He
said the developers were seeking a profit margin of 20 to 30 per
cent.
Mr
Cheng believed the redevelopment would not require a further land
premium, contrary to the view of Secretary for Housing, Planning
and Lands Michael Suen Ming-yeung, who last month said developers
would have to renegotiate the premium if they changed the floor
plan of the project.
Centaline
Surveyors managing director Victor Lai Kin-fai estimated the redeveloped
flats could be sold comfortably at about $10,000 per sq ft, primarily
due to their spectacular sea view.
8. Morrison Building to be declared official monument
MARTIN
WONG, SCMP 19 March 2004
The 70-year-old Morrison Building in Tuen Mun is to be declared
an official monument, the first time such a move has been taken
without the owner's consent.
Secretary
for Home Affairs Patrick Ho Chi-ping is initiating the procedures,
a government statement said.
"This
follows a recent decision by the chief executive in council to dismiss
the objection lodged by the owner of the building," it added.
The
Church of Christ in China owns the building at the Hoh Fuk Tong
Centre in Tuen Mun, as well as the surrounding site.
A
government spokesman said last night: "The declaration should
not prevent redevelopment in that area."
This
means only the 480 square metres of land occupied by the building
is protected, but the owner is free to redevelop more than 30,000
square metres in the surrounding areas. The church will be compensated
but the amount is still being negotiated.
The
Morrison Building was originally part of a villa built in 1936 by
Nationalist general Cai Tingjie, who led the famed Nineteenth Corps
against the Japanese.
Between
1946 and 1949, it was turned into the Dade Institute, a tertiary
educational institution founded under the directive of Zhou Enlai,
China's first premier.
"The
building bears witness to the unique role played by Hong Kong in
the history of modern China and the establishment of the People's
Republic of China," the statement said.
The
building is now used as a religious centre by the church after the
London Missionary Society formally transferred its ownership of
the site in 1961 for one dollar.
Learning
of the owner's intention to redevelop the site in 2001, the government
held talks with the church in the hope that an agreement to protect
the building, as well as enable the redevelopment project, could
be reached.
Last
April, the building was declared a Proposed Monument, which was
meant to protect the building for 12 months against the owner's
demolition plans.
In
October, Dr Ho told the owner that the government wanted to declare
the building under permanent protection, but the owner lodged an
objection.
A
government spokesman said that declaring the building a monument
for permanent protection would not affect property ownership.
9. Harbour delays ‘have cost up to $100m’
CHEUNG
CHI-FAI and ALEX LO, SCMP 19 March 2004
Delays
to the Central reclamation caused by a series of legal challenges
will cost the government up to $100 million in fees to the contractor,
a senior official said yesterday.
Director
of the Territory Development Department John Chai Sung-veng said
the project had been delayed by five months since a judicial review
was launched by the Society for Protection of the Harbour. But the
High Court ruled last week the government could proceed with the
controversial project, which involves filling in about 18 hectares
of the harbour.
"We
haven't received any claim from the contractor but this is inevitable
[because of the delays]," Mr Chai said.
He
said losses of up to $100 million had probably been incurred by
the contractor, a joint venture between China State Construction
Engineering and Leighton Contractors.
Most
of the losses were due to extra wages, equipment rental and procurement
payments already incurred or requested before the suspension of
the core reclamation works.
Mr
Chai said the estimate had not taken into account efforts by the
contractors to minimise losses during the period. "It is the
contractual responsibility for the contractor to take measures to
minimise losses in case of uncertainty over the project," he
said.
He
said there was no need at the moment to ask for extra funding from
the legislature in the face of possible claims from the contractor.
The whole project will cost about $3.8 billion.
Government
lawyers at an injunction hearing at the High Court last October
had warned of losses of almost $600 million if the project was terminated.
To
speed up the reclamation, the department is now working with the
contractor to draw up a new schedule for the project. Mr Chai said
the work would continue even if a final appeal against the project
were lodged by the society.
"We
believe that the legality of the work will not be overthrown even
if the case is brought to the Court of Final Appeal," he said.
The
society wrote to the Executive Council this week warning it was
preparing to take its case to the Court of Final Appeal and that
in the meantime, the government should suspend all reclamation works
off Central.
The
Housing, Planning and Lands Bureau said reclamation work would proceed
even though Department of Justice lawyers were studying the society's
letter. "In fact, the contractor has resumed work since last
week, after the High Court ruling," a spokesman said.
Meanwhile,
the society's former chairman, Winston Chu Ka-sun, denied there
was a rift between him and current chairwoman Christine Loh Kung-wai
over whether an appeal should be launched.
"We
both agree a final legal challenge should only be launched if there
are both legal grounds and widespread public support - both factors
are important," he said.
He
said the level of public support may be gauged from the turnout
on Sunday at a protest in which a human chain will be formed from
Queen's Pier along the harbour front. Ms Loh had said on Wednesday
that the turnout would not be a factor in deciding whether to launch
the appeal.
|