| News
Stories: |  |
Click-on
these handy "jump links" to quickly access the news item you're
looking for.
1.
Police hold Gold-Face pair in flats
fraud probe
2.
Tamar site delay hurts Shui On
3.
Tamar firms may seek expenses
4.
What would be the best way to use the
Tamar site?
1. Police hold Gold-Face pair in flats fraud probe
Dennis
Ng, The Standard 29 May 2003
Police yesterday
arrested Gold-Face Holdings managing director Tai Chi-wah and group
financial controller Lim Hau-chun over possible fraud in the disappearance
of about HK$500 million from two incomplete Tuen Mun residential
projects.
Officers from the Commercial
Crimes Bureau arrested the pair yesterday morning after searching
eight premises, including the listed developer's head office in
Tsim Sha Tsui and its Yuen Long office, on Saturday.
The move came after receivers
were appointed for the two low-density luxury projects, Villa Pinada
and The Aegean, leaving buyers facing the prospect of paying mortgages
on homes they may never own.
Sources said police arrested
Tai, 48, and Lim, 50, after they went to police headquarters about
10am. Tai had earlier sought legal advice.
Tai was detained overnight
at Wan Chai police station while Lam was taken to North Point police
station.
Ernst & Young were
brought in as receivers by a consortium of lenders led by Bank of
China (Hong Kong) over non-payment of loans totalling about HK$384.6
million.
The receivers said later
that only HK$2 million was left out of about HK$500 million paid
by buyers.
Police who raided the
company headquarters in Tsim Sha Tsui about 10am on Saturday seized
about 17 boxes of documents and numerous computer discs before leaving
about 5pm. Officers also searched the homes of some of Gold-Face's
senior management.
A police spokeswoman
said two men had been arrested ``in relation to a fraud case''.
The case has raised a
chorus of concern over the rules governing pre-sale of uncompleted
flats, a common practice in Hong Kong and the mainland.
But senior government
officials, including Secretary for Housing, Planning and Lands Michael
Suen, have said the existing safeguards are adequate and this is
an isolated case. Developers have expressed similar views.
Tai, a practising architect,
graduated from Manchester Polytechnic School of Architecture with
a bachelor's degree in arts (architectural) and a diploma in architecture.
Tai and John Wong - who resigned as a non-executive director of
Gold-Face last Tuesday - have practised as Wong & Tai Associates
Architects.
2. Tamar site delay hurts Shui On
Eli
Lau and Keith Wallis, The Standard 29 May 2003
Shui On Group,
one of the contractors short-listed for the now-postponed Tamar
complex, would be cautious when bidding for future government projects,
its chairman and chief executive Vincent Lo said yesterday.
Lo said he was ``disappointed''
by the government's decision to delay the HK$4.7 billion project
as the group has already spent HK$10 million on preparatory work.
``I'm undoubtedly disappointed
because my staff have done a lot of preparation work,'' he said
after an American Chamber of Commerce lunch. ``The group will be
vigilant when submitting tenders for government projects in future.''
Lo said the group's listed
arm, Shui On Construction and Materials, and its partner, Paul Y-ITC
Construction Holdings, had spent as much as HK$10 million on the
project.
They were among the five
construction consortia chosen to bid for the contract. The others
are China State Engineering Corporation in a joint venture with
Hip Hing Construction; DRC Tamar joint venture; Gammon Skanska and
Hsin Chong Construction in association with Obayashi.
The administration has
put the new Tamar government complex plan on hold for six months,
saying it has to ``review its spending priorities'' because of the
HK$68 billion budget deficit. The decision follows postponement
of work on the HK$22 billion Route 10 highway.
The government is also
reported to have halted three land reclamation projects due to the
property market slump. The three reclamation projects, with a combined
area of 126 hectares, are in Western District on Hong Kong Island,
and Tsuen Wan Bay and Sham Tseng in the New Territories.
Shui On's construction
division derives most of its revenue from government projects. For
the the year ending March, the company earned HK$1.97 billion, or
68 per cent of total turnover, from jobs for the Housing Authority.
Lo also revealed that
plans to spin off the group's property assets for a separate listing
had been delayed due to the Iraq war and the Sars outbreak.
Shui On Construction
and Materials shares closed unchanged yesterday at HK$4.60.
Keith Griffiths, chairman
of leading architect Aedas, estimated that the 15 construction and
design groups that initially lodged submissions for the Tamar project
had spent a combined HK$150 million on their offers.
Aedas director David
Roberts said: ``This was at a time when companies could least afford
it''.
Griffiths said the five
shortlisted groups had spent considerably more on resources in preparing
to tender.
He said the China State
Construction-Hip Hing consortium had reserved an entire floor of
its office at Wan Chai's China Overseas Building to work on its
bid.
Aedas, which is among
the five shortlisted design groups, had also expanded the floor
area of its offices to work on the Tamar project.
Griffiths said the money
that had been spent by contractors and design firms ``was a huge
waste of resources''.
This was money that could
have been spent improving Hong Kong's environment. Using the government's
fee rates, Griffiths estimated the HK$150 million was equivalent
to 150 man-years of effort.
``All we've got for that
now is an HK$8-an-hour car park,'' he said.
Griffiths believed that
the delay would give people time to re-open the debate about the
future of the site.
His own view was that,
while the landmark area should be used as a civic complex and include
a replacement Legislative Council complex, ``whether there should
be space for government is a mute point''.
He believed the new Legco
building ``should be an example of green and sustainable architecture
that would act as a hub for democracy in Hong Kong''.
3. Tamar firms may seek expenses
LOUISA
YAN, SCMP 29 May 2003
Chairman of
the Shui On Group Vincent Lo Hong-shui said yesterday he was surprised
by the decision to put the Tamar site project on hold, saying the
company would think twice before bidding for future government projects.
Mr Lo said his company
had lost millions of dollars because of the decision. He said he
hoped the government would review the project later.
"We will think more
carefully next time when we decide to bid for other government projects,"
he said.
The pre-qualification
document stated that the government was not liable for any expenses
incurred or suffered by applicants in preparing their submissions.
But legislator Lau Ping-cheung,
who represents the architectural, surveying and planning constituency,
said the common law in Hong Kong might allow companies to pursue
their losses, even though the firms had not signed contracts with
the government.
"Since the government
had shortlisted five consortia to bid for the project, the pre-qualification
exercise would mean the constructors had a reasonable expectation
that they would get the bid," he said.
"Pre-qualification
is a common practice of the government. Theoretically speaking,
each consortia had a one-in-five chance of securing the work. They
won't be able to sue for the expected returns [of the project] because
they might have lost money. But they can sue in order to recover
the cost in preparing for the submission."
But lawyer and legislator
Audrey Eu Yuet-mee said it was unclear whether common law could
be relied on in this case.
"It is a lot more
complicated than what appears on paper," she said.
The Paul Y-Shui On Joint
Venture is one of the five construction firms shortlisted by the
government. The others are China State-Hip Hing Construction Joint
Venture, DRC-Tamar Joint Venture, Gammon Skanska and Hsin Chong-Ohayashi
Joint Venture.
The government shelved
the $4.9 billion project on Monday just before tendering was due
to begin.
4. What would be the best way to use the Tamar site?
SCMP,
29 May 2003
Delaying the
development of the Tamar site gives a renewed, but slim, hope that
the government will take a more dynamic approach to Central’s
redevelopment and regeneration. Tamar is but one site in a jigsaw
that, with vision, would stretch from Tamar to the Star Ferry, including
Statue Square and the Cenotaph, linking with the Legislative Council
building then into Chater Garden.
Comprehensive integration
can also be achieved with the next phase of the Central reclamation.
Existing uses are the
PLA Garrison headquarters (an anachronism in a modern city centre);
a tired and run down City Hall (an early 1960s building whose time
has long past); the Star Ferry concourse and car park (a disgraceful
use of civic space); Statue Square (a popular focus that would benefit
from upgrading and traffic-free connection to the other sites);
the Legislative Council building (the only historic link in Central
to Hong Kong’s past); and the sad expanse of flagstones that
dominates Chater Garden.
The government has control
of Tamar, City Hall, the Star Ferry concourse, Statue Square, the
Legco building and Charter Garden – leaving the PLA headquarters
as the last, and critical, piece for a comprehensively bold and
imaginative regeneration.
No sensible town planning,
urban design or land-use planning case can be made for the PLA’s
continuation at Tamar. The government’s willingness to tackle
its removal at the highest levels in Beijing is the key, and the
evidence so far sadly indicates that the government will only skirt
around its continued presence. Let its surrender of the site be
seen as a magnanimous gesture by the PLA to the people of Hong Kong.
In return, the government should build a new HQ on a more appropriate
site outside the urban area. With the Tamar development delayed,
the government has time to tackle the politically difficult but
important surrender of the PLA HQ site.
Arthur Watson, Ap Lei
Chau
|