| News
Stories: |
 |
Click-on
these handy "jump links" to quickly access the news item you're
looking for.
1.
Earnings at steel firm build to $81m
2.
Lai Sun nears $3.6b debt deal
3.
Memories of a changing HK - 50 years
of public housing
4.
Super-jail island's rare lizard goes
to ground
5.
Huge bids prompt big questions
6.
Auction result baffles analysts
7.
Switch from pessimist to aggressive
bidder dazzles
1. Earnings at steel firm build to $81m
Eli
Lau, The Standard 2 June 2004
Van
Shung Chong Holdings has posted a 34 per cent rise in net profit
to HK$81.06 million for the year ended March 31 due to a strengthened
business model.
The
leading local maker and supplier of steel for the construction industry
said the company posted turnover of HK$3.55 billion, a leap of 34
per cent from HK$2.76 billion a year earlier.
Chairman
and chief executive Andrew Yao attributed the profit growth to the
impressive performance of both industrial products and construction
material divisions.
``The
Camp [China Advanced Material Processing] and CMB [Construction
Materials Group] business divisions have perfectly linked the two
poles of the supply chain with end customers and steel producers,''
Yao said.
Camp
and CMB reported an 18 per cent and 3 per cent surge in net income
to HK$70 million and HK$68 million respectively.
While
the company has recorded a double-digit growth in turnover over
the past two months, Yao said China's austerity measures would not
affect their steel businesses.
The
company's capital expenditure for this year would be around HK$20
million-HK$30 million, he said. As at the end of March, the company
had HK$110 million cash on hand.
``In
the coming year, one of our major tasks is to maximise the synergistic
effects brought by the group's two complementary business divisions
to provide integrated services along the value chain and supply
chain,'' Yao said. ``Such a vertical relationship will greatly enhance
our market position and maintain the group's profit margin.''
A
final dividend of 2.8 HK cents per share was declared, compared
with 5.8 HK cents a year earlier.
Shares
of Van Shung Chong yesterday dropped 10.14 per cent to close at
HK$1.33.
2. Lai Sun nears $3.6b debt deal
Raymond
Wang, The Standard 2 June 2004
Lai
Sun Development is expected to reach a deal with creditors on its
HK$3.6 billion debt restructuring plan this month, which involves
a liability cancellation of about 50 per cent.
The
company is believed to have submitted its proposal to creditors,
which include Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and four other banks.
Lai
Sun owes bond holders about HK$2.1 billion and technology affiliate
eSun Holdings up to HK$1.5 billion.
It
will repay the debt by issuing new shares to eSun, which will become
the substantial shareholder of the company, and both parties will
establish a cross-holding relationship, sources said.
eSun
chief executive Lee Po-on said last week that he expected the company
to map out terms this month for the recovery of HK$1.5 billion it
is owed by parent Lai Sun Development.
The
debt stems from HK$1.9 billion eSun paid to Lai Sun in early 1999
to acquire the retail and hotel portion of Furama Hotel. The deal
was cancelled in June 2000 without eSun ever gaining control of
the assets or recovering the money.
Lee
said eSun hoped to recover more than half the outstanding amount
after a proposal regarding loan repayment is submitted by Lai Sun
this month. eSun will then present the proposal to its independent
financial adviser for assessment.
The
debt will be settled with a small sum of cash, a tranche of new
bonds and shares representing 30-40 per cent of the enlarged issued
share capital of the company, valued at about HK$700 million, the
Oriental Daily newspaper reported yesterday.
Lai
Sun has also proposed settling HK$2.1 billion debts owed to bond
holders with the equity interest in Causeway Bay Plaza, two five-star
hotels in Vietnam and a 10 per cent stake in The Waterfront above
Kowloon Station, as well as new shares representing 20-30 per cent
of the enlarged issued share capital and a put option against the
Lam family that are valued at about HK$1 billion, the report said.
Major
shareholder Lim Por-yen currently owns about 47.55 per cent of the
company through Lai Sun International. Upon completion of the debt
restructuring, Lim's shareholding in the company will be significantly
diluted. Shares of Lai Sun Development fell 9.09 per cent to close
at HK$0.14 yesterday.
Trading in the shares of Lai Fung Holdings, the mainland property
affiliate of Lai Sun Garment (International), was suspended yesterday
pending the issue of an announcement of a rights issue.
Market
sources said Lai Fung planned to announce a one-for-four or one-for-five
rights issue to raise HK$100 million.
3. Memories of a changing HK - 50 years of public housing
POLLY
HUI, SCMP 2 June 2004
Hui Po-king, a veteran of public housing, at the opening of the
exhibition with Housing Authority chief Michael Suen. Picture by
K.Y Cheng
Public housing has come a long way since the early estates
Sixty-five-year-old
Hui Po-king conjured up an image of drug syringes, rats, filth and
illegal businesses when she talked about the earliest public housing
estates in the 1950s.
"The
lock of our communal shower room was loose. I had to guard the door
with a pair of sticks when my elder sister was taking a shower,
as drug addicts and shady figures were all over the building,"
said Ms Hui.
After
a fire destroyed her home and those of thousands of others in the
Shek Kip Mei squatter area in 1953, Ms Hui was resettled with her
family in a first-generation public housing estate in the district
and lived there until 1990.
Limited
living space caused conflicts in the estate. "Some neighbours
argued all day long. There were always arguments when people queued
up for buckets of water, which at one time was only available three
hours every four days. Some people had their buckets thrown away
when they offended the gangsters," she said.
Ms
Hui, who used to live in a family of seven in a 120 sq ft flat,
recalled how she felt like she was living in a paradise when she
moved into another public flat of the same size in 1962 - with only
her husband and daughter.
Mrs
Hui was invited to open the exhibition "Memories of Home -
50 Years of Public Housing in Hong Kong" at the Hong Kong Heritage
Museum in Sha Tin yesterday. Officiating was Michael Suen Ming-yeung,
chairman of the Hong Kong Housing Authority, and Choi Suk-kuen,
deputy director of Leisure and Cultural Services.
Featuring
life-sized models of old flats, pictures, relics, and video interviews
of residents, the exhibition is aimed at increasing understanding
of how the continual changes in public housing design have raised
the quality of life for many families.
When
the housing scheme was launched to accommodate the 53,000 people
made homeless overnight by the Shek Kip Mei fire, living conditions
in the estates were "relatively primitive", said Poon
Kai-tik, head of corporate and community relations in the housing
department.
"The
function of a flat in the 1950s was to sleep and keep your belongings,
as communal toilets, basins, and cooking stoves were all placed
outside," he said. Mr Poon said it was typical for a family
of eight to share a bunk bed in a 100 sq ft flat, with ventilation
provided by holes drilled through common walls shared by adjacent
rooms.
Hygiene
was improved over the following two decades with private washrooms,
kitchens and balconies.
There
are now about 3 million people living in public estates. Housing
Department senior architect Stephen Yim Yu-chau said future public
flat designs would include more communal facilities and better access.
Although she now lives in a subsidised home ownership flat in Tai
Po, Ms Hui said she was pleased with the rapid transformation of
public housing design.
But
she added: "The remaining Shek Kip Mei estates should be repaired
as soon as possible. I remember cement falling off the wall before
I moved out."
The
exhibition will run till October
4. Super-jail island's rare lizard goes to ground
CHEUNG
CHI-FAI, SCMP 2 June 2004
Stray
cats and dogs instead of a rare species of lizard were found on
the Hei Ling Chau site of the proposed $12 billion super-jail, according
to an engineering company.
The
firm, Mott Connell, said in its preliminary feasibility study for
the jail that no Bogadek's burrowing lizards were found on the island
during three field surveys carried out earlier this year.
Terry
Chung Tak-man, a consultant with the company, suspected the lizard
might have migrated for the winter when they visited between February
and March.
"We
did not spot any lizards during the trips. Instead, we found some
cats and dogs living both on Hei Ling Chau and its adjacent Sunshine
Island," he said.
"When
we talked to some conservationists later, they expressed fears that
the stray dogs and cats could be preying on the lizard."
Under
the super-jail plan, the woodland on the island would not be affected
and most work would be carried out on 80 hectares of reclaimed land,
Mr Chung said.
The
lizard was discovered by Father Anthony Bogadek on the island in
1987 and confirmed as a new species in 1992. The female has no legs;
the male has two legs.
Environmentalists
are worried that building the super-jail would threaten the rare
species which has not been seen on Hei Ling Chau for 17 years.
Apart
from the island, the lizard was also seen on Sunshine Island once
and three times on Shek Kwu Chau, where the latest sighting was
in 2002 by conservation officers.
"The
lizard likes to live in a damp environment and soil under the decomposing
leaves. It was really lucky for our staff to spot one two years
ago," said Simon Chan Kin-fung, a government conservation officer.
Michael
Lau Wai-neng, an amphibian expert with the Kadoorie Farm and Botanic
Garden, said it was hard to say if the company had done its best
to locate the lizard of which little was known.
"You
can't use ordinary ways to find the lizard and you need a specialist
to do the job. You also need some luck as well."
5. Huge bids prompt big questions
PEGGY
SITO and SANDY LI, SCMP 2 June 2004

The surprisingly large winning bids at last Tuesday's government
land auction have prompted a debate on whether the land sales mechanism
can be used to adjust imbalances in land demand and supply.
Property
experts say the government, the largest provider of land in Hong
Kong, can stabilise the market by supplying sites for sale through
the application list system. But they point out that not enough
sites have been reserved this year to satisfy the appetites of land-hungry
developers.
They
have urged the government to correct an expected shortage of residential
units in 2006 and 2007 by making more sites available and by releasing
projects controlled by the MTR Corp and Kowloon-Canton Railway Corp
ahead of their original schedules.
The
government introduced the application list system as a market mechanism
to determine land supply.
Under
the system, a developer proposes a price to the Lands Department
and undertakes to offer that amount of money. If the developer's
proposed price meets the government's target price, the parcel of
land goes to tender or auction.
At
last Tuesday's land auction - the first after a moratorium of 20
months - Cheung Kong (Holdings) outbid 12 other developers to win
a site of 150,760 square feet in Ma On Shan with an offer of $2.09
billion.
KWah
International bought the second site, a smaller plot of land in
Sha Tin, for $865 million. The figures were more than 70 per cent
higher than the government's reserved prices.
Analysts
wondered this week if the high price levels could be sustained when
more sites on the application list were released.
The
market will be tested when a residential lot in Sa Po Road, Kowloon
City, is auctioned off later this month.
Eddie
Hui Chi-man, associate professor in the building and real estate
department at Hong Kong Polytechnic University, said the high bids
at last week's auction were an expression of strong demand built
up among developers during the 20-month freeze. But prices would
drop if more land was made available, he said.
Professor
Chau Kwong-wing of Hong Kong University's department of real estate
and construction said the land sale system could be used to control
the balance between land supply and demand.
"If
the government sets a higher reserve price, the developers' desire
for sites will not be as keen," he said.
On
the other hand, the government could generate strong developer interest
by setting reserve prices below the market level.
Landscope
Realty managing director Koh Keng-shing predicted bidding for the
remaining sites on this year's application list would be strong.
"Only
17 sites are scheduled for sale this year. This isn't enough to
meet developer needs," he said.
Analysts
said developers could afford to pay high prices for all 17 sites.
Tuesday's
aggressive bidding prompted property consultants to revise their
total sales forecast for all 17 sites to $30 billion from $14billion,
just over $2 billion less than the $32.24 billion developers paid
for government land during the market peak of 1997.
Hang
Seng Bank criticised the lack of transparency in the land sales
mechanism in its May economic report.
It
urged the government to disclose reserve prices and explain how
these had been determined for the sake of greater transparency.
The
report said such transparency would contribute to the market's stability.
Land
prices were an important indicator of future property prices, the
report said, adding that winning bids gave a true reflection of
developers' perceptions of the market.
Without
land prices for reference, the property market would lack an important
piece of information for deciding on its future directions, the
report said.
HSBC
analyst Derek Cheung said the existing system was acceptable. But
he said developers had different ways to replenish their land banks
and did not have to make high bids for government sites.
For
example, developers were negotiating with the government for a change
in land use for nine million square feet of farm land in the New
Territories, he said.
6. Auction result baffles analysts
PEGGY
SITO, SCMP 2 June 2004
Observers
have been trying to explain the unexpected outcome of last Tuesday's
government land auction, at which Cheung Kong (Holdings) and KWah
International bid much higher than predicted for two residential
sites.
While
sceptics believe the developers' aggressive bidding was aimed at
rejuvenating the slowing housing sector, some market watchers suggest
they have made a mistake - again.
Last
week's auction evoked memories of leading developers being forced
to make huge provisions for their projects after aggressively buying
sites at the market's peak in 1997.
At
the time, Cheung Kong and Hutchison Whampoa paid $6.06 billion for
a government-auctioned site in Hunghom, now occupied by the Harbourfront
Landmark residential development.
The
crash in the property market forced them to write billions in provisions
on the development.
In
1998, Cheung Kong and Hutchison made a $1.5 billion provision for
the Caribbean Coast residential project in Tung Chung, for which
they had won development rights from the MTR Corporation in 1997.
Sun
Hung Kai Properties, defeated by Cheung Kong in last Tuesday's fierce
bidding for a Ma On Shan site, wrote off $1.1 billion on its Park
Island development in Ma Wan and Ocean Shores phase three in Tseung
Kwan O, to which it committed at the market's peak in 1997.
Henderson
Land Development recorded a write-off on its Tai Po luxury project
Beverly Hills, as did Sino Land on its Island Resort in Siu Sai
Wan. Sino Land led a consortium that paid a record $11.82 billion
for the site in 1997.
Eddie
Hui Chi-man, associate professor of the building and real estate
department at Hong Kong Polytechnic University, said: "Everyone
makes mistakes; big developers are not an exception."
Merrill
Lynch analyst Clifford Lam said: "The aggressiveness of developers
was never a good benchmark for property prices. If history is anything
to go by, we might see some kind of provision in the next three
years."
7. Switch from pessimist to aggressive bidder dazzles
ERNEST
KONG, SCMP 2 June 2004

The mystery bidder has the audience guessing. On the right is Cheung
Kong (Holdings) deputy chairman Victor Li. Picture by Dickson Lee
When
a middle-aged man in a baseball cap raised his paddle to outbid
12 rivals at last week's land auction with a jaw-dropping bid of
$2.09 billion, perhaps no one present, except those sitting with
deputy chairman Victor Li Tzar-kuoi, associated the winner with
Cheung Kong (Holdings).
Even
a staffer from the usually well-informed Sun Hung Kai Properties
was overheard asking who the mysterious bidder represented.
But
a Cheung Kong bidder in disguise should not come as a surprise.
Cheung Kong executive director Justin Chiu is known for his flamboyant
costumes. Most recently, he appeared at a company sales booth dressed
as Napoleon, in keeping with the French theme at The Pacifica, a
residential project in Cheung Sha Wan.
It
was Cheung Kong's dramatic transformation from outspoken pessimist
to belligerent bidder that most dazzled the market.
Before
the auction, Cheung Kong was outspoken on the discrepancy between
property prices and buyer affordability. Both Mr Li and Mr Chiu
said just a week before that a downward price adjustment was needed
in the market.
Cheung
Kong backed up its apparent concern by slashing prices at Caribbean
Coast, a residential project in Tung Chung.
Nan
Fung Development followed, lowering prices at Tseung Kwan O Plaza
by 10 per cent.
But
it turned out that Cheung Kong's much-publicised price cut applied
to only 10 flats, although Mr Chiu was quick to say more cuts were
planned.
Continuing
to talk down sentiment before the auction, Mr Chiu said he had spoken
to other developers and many planned to bid more conservatively
than they would have previously. But two weeks in the property market
is a long time.
Questioned
after the auction, Mr Chiu said: "I said there would be adjustments
in our projects' prices only, but did not say it would be price
cuts."
He
said some projects were still too expensive and prices at these
would have to come down, but most Cheung Kong projects were not
under the same pressure.
Talking
down the market to upset rival developers' plans is a common practice,
according to a veteran real estate agent.
|