| News
Stories: |
 |
Click-on
these handy "jump links" to quickly access the news item
you're looking for.
1.
“Through Partnership –
A Vision for Hong Kong’s Environment”
2.
Contractors hit government with $280m
bill for reclamation delays
3.
NWD bags bargain in Yuen Long land
deal
4.
LCQ3: Central Reclamation Phase III
1. “Through Partnership – A Vision for Hong Kong’s
Environment”
Skyline
Technologies, 3 June 2004
The
Hong Kong Construction Association together with the Environment,
Transport & Works Bureau and the Environmental Protection Department
convened an Environmental Conference at the Convention and Exhibition
Centre on Tuesday June 1, 2004. The conference title was “Through
Partnership – A Vision for Hong Kong’s Environment”
which acknowledged that to drive environmental excellence into our
construction industry we must work closely in a spirit of partnership.
Such a partnership forged between these three organisations will
greatly encourage improvements in the environment in which we live
and work and will make a positive difference to the quality of life
for all in Hong Kong. The conference was facilitated by Lappord
Leadership Ltd with a number of interactive rounds interspersed
with interesting and informative presentations. The photos below
are provided courtesy of Lappord Leadership Ltd.

The
conference theme of the sustainable development considered issues
associated with our society, the economy and the environment.
Metaphor
mapping techniques were enhanced by professional cartoonists who
produced a cartophor of Hong Kong’s development history from
its 1841 beginnings to guide the facilitated discussions. The cartoonists
then used the results of the work of the participants to derive
a cartophor of the conference’s vision of Hong Kong’s
struggle towards sustainable development. This cartophor was unveiled
after dinner and signed by all participants.
Ms
Christine Loh, Chief Executive Officer of Civic Exchange made a
plea for sustainable development in her after dinner speech which
was reinforced by many photographs showing the beauty of Hong Kong
and unfortunately its environmental disasters.
A
synopses of the presentations made at the conference follows:
Welcome AddressIntroduction
“Through
Partnership - A Vision for Hong Kong's Environment”
Mr. Billy Wong, President of Hong Kong Construction Association
- Permanent
Secretary for the Environment, Transport and Works Mr. Thomas
ChowThe Honourable Dr Sarah Liao, members of the Provisional
Construction Industry Coordination Board, our guests from a
wide cross section of construction industry backgrounds and
fellow contractors, … welcome to our Hong Kong Construction
Association Environmental Conference.
- In particular
I would also like to convey a warm welcome to our colleagues
from ETWB and EPD who in the true spirit of partnership have
joined hands with us to organize and sponsor this conference.
- I would
also like to single out our corporate sponsors for a special
thank you. Budgets are often stretched as we seek for continuous
improvement and raise the standard of our conferences. I am
particularly grateful to a number of corporate sponsors who
have contributed financially to what I am sure will be a most
successful afternoon and evening.
- There is
without doubt a growing emphasis on the protection of the environment
in which we live and work and the need to enhance the quality
of life of our workforce and the community. It is with this
objective in mind that the HKCA established an Environmental
Committee to develop construction industry initiatives and to
work with you all in bringing about change.
Current
Activities
- Whilst
much of the work of HKCA’s Environmental Committee involves
assistance to members on regulatory and environment protection
standards we strongly believe this has to be done in a constructive
and pro-active manner.
- Many of
our members give freely of their time to work alongside EPD,
Civil Engineering Department, Housing Authority, Government
departments and statutory bodies to enhance Hong Kong’s
construction environment.
- Expert
advice from our members contributes to the EPD’s Environmental
Impact Assessment Ordinance Contractors Liaison Group and Wasteter
Reduction and Water Pollution Control Committees. There is an
ongoing Housing Department / HKCA Environmental Forum and members
We have contributed constructively to ETWB and EPD on the proposed
Landfill Charging Scheme. There is also an ongoing Housing Department
/ HKCA Environmental Forum.
- Training
and education is a key ingredient to changing the minds and
attitudes of our industry and I would like to draw your attention
to our HKCA web-site where we are advising the industry, in
a joint project with EPD, on “Green Construction Equipment”.
- Through
the Environmental Committee the HKCA has also developed a “Best
Practice Guide for Environmental Protection on Construction
Sites” to encourage an environmentally responsible attitude
across our members and the industry …. and
- Training
and experience sharing is a key ingredient to changing the minds
and attitudes of our industry and in this regard I would like
to draw your attention to our HKCA web-site where we are advising
the industry, in a joint project with EPD, on “Green Construction
Equipment”.
- We remain
keen to work with the EPD and thank them for their support in
organizing with us a series of workshops in 2003, attended by
over 400 participants that focused upon experience sharing and
environmental good practice.
- This year’s,
inter-active, conference today will build upon these activities
by taking a more strategic look at where we should be in four
years time with respect to our environmental responsibilities
… and indeed how we will attempt to get there.
- We have
two underlying themes for this Our Environmental Conference
this afternoon “Through Partnership - A Vision for Hong
Kong's Environment” will have two underlying themes …
first in considering “a longer term vision for Hong Kong’s
environment” and second by addressing … “the
bringing about of change through industry wide partnerships”.
A
longer term vision
- Change,
particularly positive change, does not happen overnight and
to bring about lasting change we need to have clear long term
goals and targets. Such goals and targets need to draw upon
world best practice and to be set in such a way that the steps
to change are steady and irreversible.
- To be successful
many sectors of the industry must “buy in” to the
ideas, concepts and commitments that will be discussed. It is
your conference and today and I we look forward to your contribution,
to share your ideas and pledge your commitments.
- In attempting
to identify the road to our long term environmental responsibilities
we have an excellent selection of speakers from Hong Kong and
overseas who represent a wide range of construction industry
interests to share their views with us.
- After hearing
the wise words of our speakers and armed with your ideas you
will debate arrangeamong yourselves to set the short and long
terms goals and objectives for our vision through the facilitation
process of our charismatic facilitators. From their presentations
we will be asking you to debate and help through the facilitation
process in the setting of short and long term goals and objectives.
Partnerships
- The second
focus of today’s conference is to demonstrate the “power
of long term partnerships”.
- It is not
possible to realize the vision however committed we maybe to
“go it alone”. Wwe need to work with the developers,
the various Government organizations, interest groups and general
public to constantly drive home the message that the quality
of our environment is important to all of us.
- We welcome
the Ppay for Eenvironment Schemeinitiatives that isour now becoming
part of the ETWB Contract tender process., Wwe welcome the innovative
approaches encouragedrequired by our Clients, and we at HKCA
are keen to learn and prepare ourselves contribute as the environmental
sustainability causesissuesdebate rises higher on the agenda.
Conclusion
- I thank
you all for your attendance here today and I await with interest
the outcomes of your presentations and discussions.
“Vision to Reality through Partnership”
Mr Thomas Chow, JP, Permanent Secretary for Environment, Transport
and Works (Environment) (Acting)
Like
many other major world cities, Hong Kong faces the same challenge
of maintaining a fast growing economy without compromising the quality
of the living environment. Public private partnership neatly provides
the Government a window to tap into the innovation, flexibility
and efficiency of the private sector. Mr Chow will share with participants
the Government’s thinking on engaging the private sector on
environmental initiatives, and its direction on waste management.
The ultimate objective of the Government is to see environmental
protection, economic gain and social benefits as being complementary
rather than mutually exclusive.
“Sustainability – added value for all”
Mr Greg Chant-Hall, Project Director, Construction Industry Research
and Information Association (CIRIA)
Responsible
for creating the spaces in which we live and work, the construction
sector has a key part to play in achieving sustainability. The sector
has the unique opportunity of being able to provide buildings, whilst
at the same time creating employment and improving our natural environment,
helping to achieve a better way of life for all. However, the manner
in which natural resources are consumed, both in the construction
process and during the use of the built product, combined with the
polluting emissions caused by the sector, result in a track record
that is anything but sustainable.
Stimulated
by the possibility of climate change, we have over the past fifteen
10-20 years, witnessed a change in thinking of the governments of
most developed countries. Environmental and sustainability issues
are now a key priority. This has led to increasing legislation and
taxation to encourage industry to adopt more sustainable working
practices. There is now a strong business case for companies to
consider the environmental and social aspects of their activities,
in addition to the economic issues.
Responding
to the sustainability agenda is a challenge for the construction
sector. The sector has significant environmental, social and economic
impacts. We undertake work from geographically dispersed sites,
bringing together teams of individuals that may not have worked
together before, to create structures that may not have been built
before. Our challenge is to provide buildings and infrastructure
that meet the needs of society and stimulate the economy, but with
higher environmental performance.
In
practical terms, achieving a more sustainable construction project
needs to engage with all the organisations involved in the construction
process, from the initial project conception, through to its design,
construction and use. Without the involvement of all organisations,
truly sustainable construction cannot be achieved. However, it is
possible for any organisation involved in the construction process
to actively engage and ‘make a difference’ within their
sphere of influence. For example a construction contractor may benefit
from reducing the amount of waste created on site. Even for this
to be achieved, many individuals from Directors to Site Operatives,
will need to understand the benefits and their own role and responsibilities.
What
constitutes more sustainable construction needs to be assessed on
a project by project basis to identify the most important issues.
These issues can then be focused upon and managed to improve project
performance. Leading organisations are taking on-board elements
of the sustainability agenda and are gaining business benefits such
as cost savings, a marketing edge and increased improved relationships
with regulators and investors.
Understanding
the practicalities of achieving sustainable construction, and how
relevant issues have been incorporated into projects around the
globe, will help other companies to put these elements into practice.
Techniques that have proven to be successful include:
- Engagement
with all staff at all levels, inviting suggestions for process
improvements
- Monitoring
and measurement of performance to prioritise sustainability
issues and gauge the success of implementation
- Recognition
of best practice for the company and within the supply chain,
to gain further commitment
- Communication
with stakeholders such as clients, regulators and investors
to enhance company reputation
In summary, the presentation will outline the practical steps that
are being taken by leading companies in the construction sector
to engage with the sustainability agenda and achieve business benefits.
As governments increasingly recognise the importance of sustainability,
companies adopting more sustainable working practices will gain
the competitive advantage.
"Where
are we now - an industry view from REDA?"
Stephen Fong, General Manager, Swire Properties Limited
After
the environmental abuses of the Eighties and Nineties, major developers
and contractors are now taking a more proactive role in managing
the construction environment in Hong Kong. Mr. Fong’s presentation
will illustrate how measured improvements have been achieved in
partnering, reducing noise, dust, waste, accidents, with positive
gains in the environment, hygiene, recycling, built quality, and
the city's living environment. However, these improvements represent
too small a percentage of the overall environmental problem. For
Hong Kong to become a true world class city, all developers and
contractors, especially those that make up the renovation trades,
must also participate in these improvements. They create up to 40%
of city's construction waste. For the industry to improve as a whole,
everyone, including the general public must work together to combat
the city's environmental problem."
“Sustainability
in Construction: The Upside”
Mr Thomas Ho, Executive Director, Gammon Skanska Limited
Gammon
Skanska as a company are fully committed to implementing the principles
of sustainable development throughout their business. This commitment
is founded on the company’s strong belief that embracing sustainability
is not only good for the community, company employees and business
partners but also makes good business sense.
In
this talk, Mr. Ho will briefly discuss some of the common misconceptions
regarding the role of sustainability in the construction industry,
as well as the reasons why these must be overcome. Mr. Ho will then
touch upon sustainability in construction (the upside) in terms
of the benefits to the Hong Kong’s construction industry,
the importance sustainability will play in the future of industry
and the resulting benefits to be gained by Hong Kong in general.
Examples
of the benefits will be discussed including the encouragement of
partnerships, better business management, continued industry improvement
and the need to ensure the industry is aligned with Hong Kong’s
and international sustainable development agendas. The theme will
emphasize the industry’s moral obligations can be consistent
with enhanced shareholder value.
Mr.
Ho will also present some of the experiences of Gammon Skanska in
embracing sustainability, such as the use of the Balanced Scorecard
as a management tool and why Gammon Skanska’s commitment to
partnering and long-term procurement models such as PPP/PFI are
key sustainability considerations for the future of us all.
“Lead
by Example – the Shell Experience”
Mr Andy Ku, Director, Shell Hong Kong Ltd.
Partnership
is key to sustainable development. Shell partners on many fronts
with government and other stakeholders, always integrating economic,
environmental and social considerations into its management process
and decision-making. Shell’s General Business Principles embody
fundamental values of honesty, integrity and respect for people,
together with contributing to sustainable development as a way of
doing business.
Shell
operates to ISO accredited standards and monitors its processes
and premises against agreed environmental benchmarks, publishing
our performance against preset targets. We also train staff and
cooperate with contractors and customers to ensure that we all contribute
to improving and protecting our environment and quality of life.
Our health, safety, security and environment (HSSE) policy is part
of our standard contract with goods and services suppliers, and
non-conformity can result in termination of agreements. With Shell
sponsorship, three suppliers have developed their own environmental
management systems and one will apply for ISO 14001 in 2004.
Shell
also works to develop cleaner and more efficient conventional fuels
with low sulphur and low carbon content, partnering with government
to promote the benefits of energy efficiency amongst end-users.
We are pleased to play an active role on the Petroleum Industry
Automotive Fuel Steering Committee, bringing cleaner fuel technologies
and solutions to Hong Kong.
Illicit
fuel trading is a problem in Hong Kong, resulting in retail and
tax revenue losses and creating a significant fire and environmental
pollution hazard to the public. Government and the oil industry
together have combated illegal diesel since 1996. New initiatives
clamp down on illegal supplies, verify legitimate end-users and
ensure compliance with the law.
Renewable
energy is a core Shell business. Shell Solar uses solar panels to
convert sunlight into clean electric power without emitting CO2,
working closely together with contractors in applying and integrating
photovoltaic technology for the construction and building industry.
Partnership with contractors and customers
We
value our partnerships with contractors and customers. Our health,
safety, security and environment, or HSSE, policy is an integral
part of our standard contract with goods and services suppliers.
The importance of environmental protection is emphasiszed through
regular and methodical screening of the operations of contractors.
We ensure that external service providers dispose of any waste material,
such as sludge or batteries, in accordance with the laws of Hong
Kong. We also conduct site visits to the factories of major product
suppliers to assess their manufacturing processes including waste
disposal and pollution control measures. Any non-compliance may
result in termination of an agreement.
As
part of our ongoing efforts in green procurement, we have assisted
three of our SME suppliers to develop their own environmental management
systems, or EMS, by sponsoring them to join Project Acorn, a support
programme aiding EMS design and implementation. All of them plan
to develop their EMS within 2004, and our LPG supplier will also
apply for ISO 14001 accreditation in 2004.
Training
remains a priority in order to ensure both our contractors and customers
contribute to improving the quality of the environment. For instance,
our recent Oil Spill Awareness training, which involved 150 people,
helped our contractors and their drivers to refresh awareness about
how to handle oil products. This was followed by site visits and
a post-implementation review to assess the effectiveness of this
effort.
We
also organise training and seminars for our customers’ staff
on handling dangerous goods, contingency response to oil spillage
and updates on environmental regulations. And wWe also share our
experience of acquiring ISO 14001, hoping to promote higher standards
in various industries.
On
a broader scale, Shell partners with government, contractors, and
with the construction industry in particular, and local communities
to build facilities which incorporatehas the latest in effluent
treatment and environmental protection practic facilities. The $4.3
billion Nanhai petrochemicals plant in Daya Bay is a major construction
project being built by a Shell JV, with strict guidelines to ensure
reduced environmental impacts at all stages of development. This
project offers many benefits and sets a benchmark for futuresimilar
cross-boundary projects in China.i n Mainland China, which has a
strategic significance for Hong Kong.
Achieving
sustainable development means we must all work together. Economic,
environmental and social considerations must be implemented through
strategic partnerships between government and other parties today,
if we wish to live in a better environment in future.
“Sustainability
in Major Infrastructure Projects”
Glenn Frommer, Sustainability Development Manager, MTRC
Contractors
and clients alike are searching for ways to continually improve
the performance of their projects. Clients are looking for ways
to have projects delivered to the appropriate quality, at cost and
on programme, while contractors are searching for ways to deliver
projects to the required degree of quality, on programme while making
a profit. While the two groups appear to have similar outcomes in
common, adversarial relationships can develop. No where is this
more costly or damaging as in major infrastructure projects.
Sustainability
has been touted as one measure that could cure the ills of our modern
society. For example, the Hong Kong Government requires all funding
requests for major infrastructure projects to include a section
on sustainable development and EPD is using the mantle of sustainability
to develop stakeholder engagement as Continual Public Involvement
(CPI). With so little known and understood about sustainability,
it would seem that this is an appropriate time to examine sustainability
in the context of major infrastructure projects as the type developed
and operated by the MTRC,
This
paper attempts to set up an understanding of sustainability in terms
of risk management, a methodology that is well known and understood
both by projects proponents and contractors. Within that context,
sustainability is considered as increasing long-term shareholder
value based on mitigating or optimizing economic, social responsibility
and environmental risks. A distribution of risks in the form of
a football results.
The
paper then moves to consider compliance issues in terms of legal
compliance to Hong Kong law and to companies’ own policies
and statements. Social responsibility issues are discussed in this
context and the main conclusion is that clients and contractors
must provide reports on their economic, social and environmental
achievements to improve their transparency and accountability. A
typical project is considered where the contractors are appointed
well after the initial design is completed and arguments are presented
for breaking down the silo mentality by decreasing the degrees of
separation.
As
the understanding and management of stakeholders is seen to be a
critical element, two examples are illustrated from current MTRC
projects, the development of the Ngong Ping to Tung Chung Cable
Car and the West and South Island Lines.
It
is concluded that sustainability is dependent on clients and contractors
working more closely with each other to develop synergies, and clients
and contractors reporting on their economic social and environmental
achievements.

2. Contractors hit government with $280m bill for reclamation delays
CHEUNG
CHI-FAI, SCMP 3 June 2004
The
government faces a $280 million compensation claim from the contractors
involved in the Central Reclamation because of the delay caused
by a dispute over the legality and size of the project.
But
it does not plan to seek any money from the Society for the Protection
of the Harbour, whose lawsuit caused the delay.
The
claim, lodged by the joint venture of Leighton Contractors and China
State Construction Engineering Company, is $180 million more than
the amount estimated by the Territory Development Department as
the cost of the delay.
Secretary
for Housing, Planning and Lands Michael Suen Ming-yeung told legislators
yesterday that the claim, lodged on April 17, was caused by a partial
suspension of reclamation work between last September and March
9 this year.
During
that time, the government was brought to court by the Society for
Protection of the Harbour, which claimed the $3.79 billion project
breached the Harbour Protection Ordinance.
After
public campaigns against the project, the government was forced
to suspend the piling work but pressed on with the dredging.
Work
resumed fully after the Court of First Instance rejected the society's
case on March 9.
Mr
Suen said the government was asking the contractor to provide more
details about, and justification for, the claim.
"[The
process of seeking compensation] has not started and we are checking
the information we have," he said, adding it was possible that
adjustments to the work schedule could reduce the claim.
Society
chairwoman Christine Loh Kung-wai told ATV her group was not liable
for the claim.
She
also questioned its size, saying it was significantly higher than
the original estimate.
Ms
Loh said she could not believe there was not a clause in such a
major infrastructure contract covering the circumstances under which
a claim could be made and how to calculate any claim.
A
spokeswoman for the bureau said the government would not make a
claim against the society for the extra costs due to the delay.
"It
is a separate issue and we will not seek to claim," she said.
Chris
Gordon, a spokesman for Leighton, said it was "just an interim
claim and we are required to substantiate it".
Mr
Gordon said the claim included higher costs for the mobilisation
of equipment, materials and storage. It also included legal costs
but it could be adjusted after the remaining work programme was
changed.
3. NWD bags bargain in Yuen Long land deal
ERNEST
KONG, SCMP 3 June 2004
With
market talk suggesting land premiums are on the rise, New World
Development (NWD) seems to have snapped up a bargain, concluding
years of negotiations over land use for a Yuen Long agricultural
site and taking advantage of a land premium offered before last
week's land auction.
It
has been reported that NWD agreed to a land premium of about $200
million, representing an average $780 per square foot. The firm
plans to build a low-density villa complex on the 2.4 hectare site
in Tong Yan San Tsuen.
An
industry source said the government had been encouraged to increase
land premium asking prices by more than 30 per cent after unexpectedly
vigorous bidding at the auction.
"While
developers have shown that they are willing to pay land prices that
roughly translate into a cost as high as the current market price
of completed projects, developers have much less bargaining power
in negotiating the amount of land premium with the government,"
he said.
Sun
Hung Kai Properties recently agreed to a land premium of about $596
million, or $865 per square foot, for a site in To Fung Shan, near
the Sha Tin auction site, which sold for more than $3,300 per sq
ft last week.
Market
observers said the relatively low land premium offered to NWD was
one of the last of its kind. The government's offers normally expire
after about a month.
Derek
Cheung, an HSBC analyst, said the government had no choice but to
increase the land premium. "The government has to raise the
land premium or it will be inconsistent with the high land price
set in the auction."
However,
he said, the government would also consider the valuation of nearby
properties when setting land premiums.
4. LCQ3: Central Reclamation Phase III
Hong
Kong Government, 2 June 2004
Following
is a question by the Hon Martin Lee and an oral reply by the Secretary
for Housing, Planning and Lands, Mr Michael Suen, in the Legislative
Council today (June 2):
Question:
Will
the Government inform this Council:
(a)
of the number of claims for compensation received so far in respect
of the Central Reclamation Phase III ("CRIII"), as well
as the nature and amount of each claim, and the percentage of the
amount in relation to the value of the contract concerned;
(b)
whether it will undertake not to allow the redevelopment or conversion
of the buildings on the existing waterfront into high-rise buildings
upon completion of the reclamation project and construction of the
new waterfront; if so, of the details of the undertaking; if not,
the reasons for that; and
(c)
whether it will consider holding an open competition in respect
of the design of the above new waterfront and appointing private
sector organisations to manage the new reclamation area; if so,
of the details; if not, the reasons for that?
Reply:
Madam
President,
(a)
The main contract of the Central Reclamation Phase III ("CRIII")
works was awarded to the Leighton - China State - Van Oord Joint
Venture ("the Contractor") on 10 February 2003 with an
awarded contract sum of $3,790 million. Pending the outcome of the
CRIII judicial review, the Government suspended the scheduled marine
piling and reclamation works under the CRIII contract from 28 September
2003 to 9 March 2004. In addition, the marine works had been disturbed
by a green group. The Contractor submitted on 17 April 2004 a consolidated
claim, the contents of which concerned the delay and the related
expenditure resulting from the suspension of works. According to
the preliminary information provided by the Contractor, the amount
claimed is estimated to be $280 million, which is about 7% of the
awarded contract sum. Territory Development Department has asked
the Contractor to provide detailed information and justifications,
and will consider and process the claim in accordance with the established
procedures.
(b)
Developments in the existing Central waterfront are covered by the
approved Central District (Extension) Outline Zoning Plan ("OZP").
The OZP has clearly stipulated the land use, development restrictions
and building height restrictions regarding any new developments
or redevelopments.
(c)
The open space of the future Central waterfront will be developed
into a vibrant and accessible waterfront promenade for the enjoyment
of citizens and tourists alike. The newly formed Harbour-front Enhancement
Committee ("HEC") will advise the Government on the planning,
land use and development of the existing and future harbour-front.
Members of the public are welcome to give their views to the HEC
on areas including the design of the Central waterfront promenade,
the best implementation method and the management issues, including
the proposal on private sector participation.

|