| News
Stories: |
 |
Click-on
these handy "jump links" to quickly access the news item
you're looking for.
1.Greens
hit harbor treatment expansion
2.
Building for the environment
3.
Put to the test: Rugby Talk May 2005
4. LCQ10: Hunghom Peninsula
5. LCQ1:
MTR West Island Line to start planning and design
1. Greens hit harbor treatment expansion
Monday
Ng, The Standard 6 July 2005
Taxpayers
are being asked to throw more money into the Harbor Area Treatment
Scheme (HATS) for a cleaner harbor - but environment experts say
some of the facilities are unnecessary.
Legislators
Tuesday approved a request for HK$166 million for what the government
called some ''time-critical'' steps for HATS Stage 2A. These include
an environmental-impact assessment and design of the tunnel system,
and the extensive ground investigation needed to ensure the design
is optimized.
According
to the Environmental Protection Department, Stage 2A includes about
20 kilometers of tunnel to convey sewage for treatment.
It
is necessary to carry out extensive ground investigation early into
stage 2A to provide suitable information for planning, design, tendering
and construction of the tunnel, it said.
The
department said that, if approval for ``time-critical'' items is
not granted this year, it will not be able to meet the timeframe
of the project.
Stage
1 of HATS started in 1994 and came into operation in 2001. This
included the construction of an interim outfall tunnel, the comprehensive
upgrading of seven preliminary treatment works and seven tunnels
for collecting sewage from urban Kowloon, Tsing Yi, Kwai Chung,
Tseung Kwan O and eastern Hong Kong Island and conveying it to a
chemically enhanced primary treatment plant at Stonecutters Island.
Stage
2A, which commenced in April 2005 and is targeted for completion
in 2013, comprises the extension of the deep tunnel network to collect
and convey sewage from the remaining parts of Hong Kong Island to
Stonecutters Island Sewage Treatment Works for proper treatment.
It
also expands the capacity of the existing chemical treatment from
the current level of 1.7 million cubic meters daily to 2.8 million
cubic meters, and provides for the disinfection of all treated effluents
before being discharged into the harbor.
Environment
concern groups said the design of Stage 2A may result in a 35 percent
wastage.
``As
present, consumption is 1.8 million cubic meters per day, so the
addition of one million cubic meters may never be used at all,''
Conservancy Association director Albert Lai said.
Legislator
Emily Lau agreed that it would be a waste if facilities are left
idle.
To achieve a full cost recovery by the time stage 2A is completed,
the average household monthly bill will rise from the current HK$11
to HK$26 over the next eight years.
2. Building for the environment
ERNEST
KONG, SCMP 6 July 2005

A
growing number of developers are adopting green building strategies
as a way to vie for multinational corporate tenants who prefer features
that will save energy, reduce waste and increase productivity.
Several
multinational corporations have started employing independent consultants
to examine the environment and energy efficiency of buildings before
they ink their leases, according to Kevin Edmunds, deputy director
of the Business Environment Council (BEC).
"Not
many companies have adopted the practice, but it is a sign that
they are now asking for more than space efficiency," he said.
The
Royal Bank of Scotland and the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi separately
employed consultancy firms in fields such as mechanics and information
technology to analyse design features of the new AIG Tower in Central
before signing up as tenants, according to market sources.
Mr
Edmunds said more corporations were issuing reports under sustainability
reporting guidelines drawn up by the independent Global Reporting
Initiative (GRI), a collaborating centre of the United Nations Environmental
Programme.
These
corporations' demand for environmentally friendly regional offices
was increasing accordingly, he said.
"[Environmental
designs] have become part of the design process for new office design,"
Mr Edmunds said. However, the Grade-B office and residential sectors
had been slow to follow suit.
Among
the companies that have issued reports under GRI guidelines is the
investment bank UBS, which has signed a 10-year lease at Hong Kong's
tallest building, Two IFC.
Nigel
Smith, executive director of office service at CB Richard Ellis,
said the concept of corporate compliance had significantly changed
the decision-making process on office relocations. International
firms were now willing to pay considerably more to ensure that their
staff worked in better and safer environments.
"Office
rents in Hong Kong have gone up quickly over the past few months,
but these companies would rather take the time [for analysis] and
pay higher rent," he said.
"[Relocation]
decisions are now centralised at headquarters. They are going not
only through the chief operation office but through the human resources
and IT departments."
He
said office tenants now had a much longer wish list about office
design features than they had two years ago.
Among
the companies embracing environmentally friendly design features
is Henderson Land Development, a joint venture developer of International
Finance Centre (IFC) in Central.
"It
doesn't really cost a lot more if you start incorporating [green]
features in the design stage," said David Dumigan, deputy general
manager of Henderson Land Development's project management department.
He
said IFC, the company's latest development, cost only about $1,100
per square foot, which was in line with the cost of building traditional
projects.
Some
environmentally friendly features were expensive to install but
were economical in the long run, he said.
The
sea water-cooled air conditioners installed at IFC cost double the
price of traditional coolers but cost 30 per cent less to run, he
added.
Buildings
consume 40 per cent of the world's total energy, 25 per cent of
its wood harvest and 16 per cent of its water, according to the
US Department of Energy's Centre for Sustainable Development.
Green
buildings are designed to drastically reduce the energy and resources
necessary to build and occupy them.
A
growing number of private developers in Hong Kong's increasingly
competitive office market have signed up to the Hong Kong Building
Environmental Assessment Method (HK-BEAM), initiated by the Real
Estate Developers' Association in 1995 and backed by the BEC.
Early
participants were big developers such as Hong Kong and China Gas,
the government's Buildings Department and Housing Authority and
Swire Properties, developers of Three Pacific Place, with smaller
developers having signed up since 2000.
HK-BEAM
last month announced the 100th participant in its green building
award, Lam Tin Residential Estate.
Sustainably
yours
AIG
Tower
• Instead of the usual 100 per cent site coverage, the building
is set back by 20 per cent to provide more space for greenery on
the ground level
• Solar panels on the roof supplement hot-water requirements
Two
IFC
• The air-conditioning system is cooled by sea water
• Air-pressurised staircases keep smoke out of fire escape
routes
The
Parcville
• Built using environmentally friendly materials
• Has a greenhouse for residents
One
Peking Road
• Solar-powered motors for the blinds
Three
Pacific Place
• A transparent glazed curtain wall saves energy costs by
providing insulation to reduce heat while letting in more natural
light
3. Put to the test: Rugby Talk May 2005
Ruby
Talk, 6 July 2005
Bob
Lloyd recalls toughest decision of his rugby career
It’s
a dilemma the modern player would never have to face – “tour
with the Lions or take your exams.” But back in the days of
amateur rugby union, it was a choice which caused longtime Hong
Kong resident Bob Lloyd "a lot of grief". The year was
1968 and Lloyd, a 25-year-old centre for English club Harlequins,
had just enjoyed the finest season of his rugby career.
He
had scored four tries in three matches against the touring All Blacks
one for the Midlands and Home Counties, two on his England debut
and another one for the Barbarians and had played in all four of
England's matches in the Five Nations Championship.
Then
came a letter from Lions management informing him he had been chosen
for the tour to South Africa. Great news, except Lloyd was studying
for his civil engineering degree at Hatfield polytechnic near London
and was due to take his second-y ear exams.
"At
the start of that season, the Home Unions had circulated players
asking about their availability for the tour," recalls Lloyd
(pictured). "I was surprised even to he asked, but indicated
I would be available providing my exams could be reorganised. After
that, I thought no more about it."
"But
that season I was fortunate enough to make my England debut against
New Zealand and I played in the Five Nations. So at the end of the
season they picked the Lions tour party and I was in it.
"That
was when the dilemma over the exams came in. I went to the head
of the civil engineering department at Hatfield polytechnic and
he refused to budge. He said, 'You've got to make a choice, you
either delay your exams a year, or you don't go.'
"Today,
obviously, I would go because I would be a paid professional, but
back then I was an amateur trying to develop a career in civil engineering.
And I'd had a fairly chequered academic career, so I decided 1 lust
couldn't go.
"It
brought me a lot of grief at the time. It would have been great
to have gone, it would have been the making of me, but I felt it
was not as important as other people thought it."
The
Lions' loss was, eventually, Hong Kong's gain. Lloyd never did add
to his five England caps, but he was selected for the team's uncapped
Far East tour in 1971 and fell in love with Hong Kong.
Two
years later, he and Aileen moved here so he could take up a post
with the Public Works Department and Lloyd continued playing, skippering
Hong Kong both at 15s and in the inaugural Hong Kong Sevens in 1976.
More
than 31 years after arriving, the Lloyds are still here. Bob, who
helps select the Best and Fairest player each year at the Hong Kong
Sevens, follows the international rugby scene with interest, but
this summer's Lions tour won't induce any° wishful thinking.
"I
don't regret my decision. I regret the circumstances," he says.
"I think I made the right decision, for me, at that time."
For Bob Lloyd's all-time Lions Dream XV, see the Bulletin Board
4.
LCQ10: Hunghom Peninsula
Hong Kong Government, 6 July 2005
Following
is a question by the Hon Ronny Tong and a written reply by the Secretary
for Housing, Planning and Lands, Mr Michael Suen, in the Legislative
Council today (July 6):
Question:
It
has been reported that the developer which purchased Hunghom Peninsula
has recently drawn up a renovation plan for that estate, and is
prepared to make substantial alterations to its original fitting-out.
On the other hand, according to the sale and purchase agreement
signed by the Government and that developer, the latter should obtain
the Government's permission before conducting any major renovation
and alteration. In this connection, will the Government inform this
Council:
(a)
of the details of the above renovation plan, and whether it has
been approved by the Government; if so, whether the authorities
have required the developer to pay extra premium; if so, of the
amount involved; and
(b)
given that renovation works of buildings will generate substantial
construction waste, whether the authorities have assessed the impact
of the waste generated by the renovation works of Hunghom Peninsula
on the environment, and how they will tackle the problem?
Reply:
Madam
President,
My
reply to the two-part question is as follows:
(a) The developer of Hunghom Peninsula submitted for the Building
Authority's approval the relevant building plans concerning the
alteration and addition works to the residential and non-residential
portions on May 12, 2005 and on June 13, 2005 respectively. The
proposed alteration and addition works include the addition of lifts,
combination of flats and revision to internal layout, renovation
of external walls, and alterations to carpark and emergency vehicular
access. The plans are still under processing.
Up
to now, the Lands Department has not received any application for
lease modification from the developer. Under the established practice,
when such an application is received and approved, premium will
be assessed by the Lands Department.
(b)
Similar to other construction projects, alteration works of Hunghom
Peninsula should comply with all the relevant statutory environmental
requirements. The Environmental Protection Department is very concerned
about the environmental impact due to the construction waste generated
in the alteration works and has requested the developer to submit
a comprehensive waste management plan. This is to ensure that measures
are undertaken to reduce the generation of construction wastes requiring
disposal, to manage construction waste properly and to reuse and
recycle useful materials. The developer has committed to submitting
the plan after the details of the alteration works are finalised.
5. LCQ1: MTR West Island Line to start planning and design
Hong
Kong Government, 6 July 2005
Following
is a question by the Hon Ma Lik and a reply by the Secretary for
the Environment, Transport and Works, Dr Sarah Liao, in the Legislative
Council meeting today (July 6) :
Question:
In
February this year, the MTR Corporation Limited (MTRCL) submitted
to the Government a revised project proposal on two railway extensions,
namely the West Hong Kong Island Line (WIL) and the South Hong Kong
Island Line (SIL). The Transport Panel of this Council also passed
two motions in the same month urging the Government to expedite
the construction of the railway extensions. In this regard, will
the Government inform this Council:
(a)
the proposed implementation timetable for WIL; and
(b)
whether WIL and SIL are still treated as a single project, and thus
only one financial analysis report has been provided; if so, whether
such an approach is the cause for WIL's not being implemented yet?
Reply
:
Madam
President,
The
Chief Executive-in-Council has agreed that:
(i)
the MTR Corporation Limited (MTRCL) should be asked to proceed with
the preliminary planning and design of the proposed "West Island
Line" (WIL), involving the extension of the MTR Island Line
from Sheung Wan to Kennedy Town with two intermediate stations at
Sai Ying Pun and University;
(ii)
negotiations with the MTRCL on the detailed scope, cost and implementation
programme for the WIL should commence; and
(iii)
the proposed "South Island Line" (SIL) should be kept
under review and its way forward considered in the light of the
results of the review on the planning of tourism and commercial
development in the Southern District due to be completed by the
end of 2005 and our consideration of Ocean Park's redevelopment
proposal.
We
are following up the above decision, and are now negotiating with
the MTRCL on the detailed scope, cost and implementation programme
for the WIL. We hope that we can reach agreement with the MTRCL
as soon as practicable.
In
the revised proposal submitted by the MTRCL in February this year,
the WIL is set out as one proposed project. The SIL is split into
"South Island Line (East)" and "South Island Line
(West)". A separate financial analysis on the WIL has been
provided in the proposal. |