| News
Stories: |  |
Click-on these
handy "jump links" to quickly access the news item you're looking
for. 1.
Flats price war escalates 2.
McNealy promises to make sure that Sun rises again 3.
800 years of data shows commodities immune to trends 4.
No 1 SAR tycoon triggers flurry of blue-chip director
buy-backs 5.
Big Blue to pump US$23m into Linux centre 6.
You'll find very few holes in this busy scheduler 7.
Time to heed Greenspan's fiscal advice 8.
Unreasonable art of investing
1. Flats price war escalates SOPHIA
WONG, SCMP Sep 14, 2002
A price-cutting
war among property developers was ratcheted up yesterday after HKR International
slashed prices at a Discovery Bay project to a level it claims is 10 per cent
below prevailing prices in the area. The
move came a day after Kerry Properties cut prices at a New Territories development
by up to 18 per cent compared with the project's launch in March and reflects
a growing battle among developers to grab buyers' attention. HKR
International managing director Victor Cha Mou-zing said demand was weak and oversupply
was causing developers to offload units cheaply. He denied deliberately undercutting
rivals. The
company will release 18 units at its Siena Two project in the Lantau Island project
for public sale next Saturday, one day before the official sale of Sun Hung Kai
Properties Aegean
Coast development in Tuen Mun. "The
prices [for additional units to be released for sale] could be revised upward
if the market response is good, or downward for a poor response. I cannot predict
when the property market can recover," Mr Cha said. He denied targeting Sun
Hung Kai Properties'
similar resort-style development, saying HKR International considered competing
projects when setting prices but did not actively seek to undermine them.
The first batch
of 12 high-rise apartments, measuring 658 square feet to 1,175 sq ft, were priced
at an average of HK$2,098 per square foot. Another six low-rise units, ranging
from 565 sq ft to 1,368 sq ft, were pitched at an average of HK$2,648 per square
foot. The cheapest unit will be offered for HK$1.178 million. At
the peak of the market in 1997 comparable high-rise units in Discovery Bay sold
for HK$6,000 to HK$8,000 per square foot while low-rise units reached more than
HK$10,000 per square foot. Sun
Hung Kai Properties has released additional 24 units at its Aegean Coast development
for public sale at an average price of about HK$2,100 per square foot. The cheapest
unit is priced at HK$966,400, or HK$1,479 per square foot. The first batch of
24 units was offered a few weeks ago at an average of HK$2,316 per square foot
for cash. Commenting
on the broader market situation, Mr Cha said demand was weak and sales of new
projects were slowing down after a flurry of new launches. He
urged the government to review its housing policy and actively reduce supply by
all means possible to bolster market sentiment. Hong
Kong Resort marketing general manager Chan Chi-ming said about 100 larger-sized
units at Siena Two with better views would be released for internal sale today
at higher prices. Siena
Two comprises 757 units due to be completed by March next year. Mr Chan said the
developer could release up to 266 units for internal sale. Mr Cha said the
company could reap HK$2 billion after all units were sold. He said he expected
the project would be profitable, although much less than originally hoped for.
Surpass
Strategy Consultant managing director Charles Lai Chin-pang said prices in Discovery
Bay were under pressure due to abundant supply in nearby Tung Chung. On Monday,
Cheung Kong (Holdings) will release 100 units at its West Kowloon development,
Hampton Place, for "internal sales", which is not subject to market
restrictions, at an average of HK$2,800 per square foot.
2. McNealy promises to make sure that Sun rises again BLOOMBERG
in New York, SCMP Sep 14, 2002
Sun Microsystems
chief executive Scott McNealy says he is committed to increasing the company's
profitability, a goal that may include further steps to restructure the network
specialist. "We've
got to get this company to a higher level of profitability and we are going to
do that through growth or through restructuring," Mr McNealy said this week.
"We are doing everything we can to grow into the current structure."
Sun's shares
are trading at their lowest price since December 1996. Sales dropped 32 per cent
in the year ending June as businesses delayed buying new servers and as rivals
such as Dell Computer and Microsoft delivered new computers and software. In October
Mr McNealy reduced his staff by 3,900, or 9 per cent, less than some investors
said was needed to stave off losses. "The
cost structure is still sized for a hyper-growth market and we're clearly not
in a hyper-growth market," Christian Koch, an analyst at Trusco Capital Management,
said. The
shares of Santa Clara-based Sun have lost 74 per cent of their value this year,
compared with a 35 per cent decline in the Standard & Poor's 500 Computer
Hardware Index. Industry-wide sales of servers, including Sun's Solaris, fell
25 per cent last year, and are forecast to decline again this year, researcher
IDC said. "Mr
McNealy needs to cut jobs by 15 per cent more in order to return to historical
revenue-per-employee levels," Toni Sacconaghi, a Sanford Bernstein analyst,
said in a research report two weeks ago. Sun's
market value is now about US$10.6 billion, less than analysts' 2003 average sales
estimate of $13.2 billion, based on a Thomson First Call survey. "We
had more buy recommendations when we were selling at 10 times revenue," Mr
McNealy said.
3. 800 years of data shows commodities immune to trends REUTERS
in New York, SCMP Sep 14, 2002 While
most economists look back five or 10 years to assess long-term inflation trends,
one analyst has concluded from 800 years of historical data that there is little
threat of inflation, or deflation, even with commodity prices surging to 19-month
highs this week. The
Reuters Commodity Research Bureau Futures (CRB) Index, a basket of 17 commodities,
rose to its highest since February last year on Tuesday. "Commodity
prices don't trend. There is not going to be much inflation because there is not
the demand out there to drive inflation, and I think we won't have deflation like
in Japan," said Bryan Taylor, president of Global Financial Data, which claims
to have the most extensive historical financial database in the world. Mr
Taylor's data shop has figures on prices of raw goods like wheat dating back to
the age of Richard the Lion Heart, feudalism and the Crusades. "We
have one series of prices going back to 1200 collected by old monasteries and
it was put together as a consumer price index for England," said Mr Taylor.
In 1200,
John Plantagenet had just replaced his brother Richard as king of England. The
legendary Robin Hood was stealing from the rich whose wealth depended on the prices
of commodities such as iron, wool, salt and livestock. The
CRB Index sprinted to 228.53 on Tuesday. The index, widely watched as a gauge
of pipeline price pressures, is skewed toward agricultural commodities and has
been propelled largely by rising grains and energy prices. This
put the index up nearly 19 per cent year-to-date and up 25.3 per cent from its
nadir of 181.83 last year.
4. No 1 SAR tycoon triggers flurry of blue-chip director buy-backs ROBERT
HALILI, SCMP Sep 14, 2002
The SAR's top
tycoon Li Ka-shing is considered a model of market timing. So when he makes insider
purchases, it is no surprise other blue-chip directors are quick to follow.
Mr Li spent HK$114 million buying stock in his flagship Cheung Kong Holdings last
month. Since then there have been insider purchases in Cheung Kong subsidiaries
Hutchison Whampoa and Bank of East Asia (BEA). Hutchison
managing director Canning Fok Kin-ning bought shares of his firm for the second
time in the past month. He acquired 50,000 shares on September 5 at $51 each.
He had bought 150,000 shares on August 23 at $55 to $55.75 per share. The purchases
in the past three weeks have boosted his holdings by nearly 16 per cent to 1.46
million shares. Fellow
director Edith Shih picked up 18,000 shares from August 23 to 28 at $53 to $55
per share. Her purchases more than doubled her holdings to 34,600 shares. The
counter closed at $51.25 yesterday. BEA
director Simon Li Fook-sean, bought 100,000 shares on September 5 at $14.38 per
share. That was the first purchase by a director of the bank since January last
year. BEA's
share price has fallen by more than 17 per cent since the first week of May. The
group announced last month profit attributable to shareholders of $786.59 million
for the six months to 30 June, down by 22.3 per cent from the same period last
year. The stock closed at $14.35 yesterday. Lee
Shau Kee, chairman of Henderson Land and Henderson Investment is expected to join
the tycoons' buying spree once year-end results are published in the first week
of next month. Mr
Lee should focus on Henderson Land which closed at $24.40 yesterday, down sharply
from his last purchase price of $31.60 on March 26. After
selling 1.28 million shares of consumer products exporter Li & Fung on April
26 at about $13 per share, US-based fund house The Capital Group waited until
the share price fell by 36 per cent before buying back. The
Capital Group bought 4.03 million Li & Fung shares on September 4 at prices
ranging from $7.80 to $8.25 per share. The purchase boosted its holdings to 319.58
million shares or 11.05 per cent of the issued capital. Investors
should note that the fund manager's sale last April was made at a hefty profit
as the group had previously acquired nearly 28 million shares on January 2 at
about $9 per share. Capital
Group's purchases were preceded by Li & Fung executive director Annabella
Leung Wai-ping who acquired 320,000 shares from August 29 to 30 at an average
of $8.57 each. Those were the first purchases by a director of the company since
April 2000. Li
& Fung closed at $8.20 yesterday. Robert
Halili is managing director at Asia Insider.
5. Big Blue to pump US$23m into Linux centre DANYLL
WILLS in Singapore, SCMP Sep 14, 2002 IBM
will invest US$23 million in the IBM Open Computing Centre in Singapore, according
to chief financial officer John Joyce. He
was speaking in Singapore at the official opening of the centre. The initiative
is a collaboration between IBM and the Nanyang Polytechnic (NYP). About
half of that money will be spent this year and the rest over the next three years.
The centre will focus on training engineers, and developing and then testing software.
The emphasis will be on Linux, open source and IBM's WebSphere. "Across
the world, IBM is seeing open standards appeal to governments who value freedom
from proprietary operating systems and favour a stable, secure, scalable, open
and cost-effective infrastructure to deliver business value," Mr Joyce said.
"We
have worked with various governments and are seeing the trend towards open computing
worldwide. Here, today, the collaboration between NYP and IBM marks a significant
milestone for Singapore's IT industry." The
company once known for its proprietary products has become a champion of open
standards. "The way forward for the global IT industry is to render proprietary
standards irrelevant. Without open standards, it will be impossible for companies
and institutions now locked into proprietary platforms to share data, applications
or computing power," he said. At
IBM's Changi Business Park, there will be a Linux Integration Zone that will promote
open standards among IBM's business partners. The
chief operating officer of the Infocomm Development Authority (IDA) of Singapore,
Tan Ching Yee, said she was happy to see the collaboration. "IDA is pleased
to see this strategic collaboration between Nanyang Polytechnic and IBM Singapore
in launching the WIZ Web Services Innovation Zone. "We
support open standards because it provides users an opportunity to choose among
products from multiple suppliers and gives IT companies the ability to offer innovative
solutions." Lin
Cheng Ton, the principal and chief executive officer of NYP, praised open standards
as the way of the future. "We believe [they are] a key element of scalable
and secure applications that integrate into existing computing environments and
provide seamless transactions across a wide variety of platforms." IBM
and NYP will offer quick-start training programmes for those unfamiliar with Linux
and open source and help other business partners who want to test their software.
IBM was
a keen supporter of open standards, Mr Joyce said. "At IBM, we understand
and passionately support this notion of technology independence. We've transformed
our own company from an organisation that made its fortune from proprietary technologies
into one that sees its future in openness," he said. IBM
was better suited to understand these issues than anyone else. "Maybe it's
because we are so acutely aware of the fallacy of proprietary controls that we
have learnt to resist them. In a customer-driven world, open architectures and
open standards are inevitable," he said.
6. You'll find very few holes in this busy scheduler DAVE
HORRIGAN, SCMP Sep 14, 2002 Every time I meet a Windows user who discovers
that I am a Mac specialist, they ask me the same question: Does the Mac have a
good calendar/contact application? The simple answer is: yes. In OS
X, Entourage, Now Up-to-Date and Now Contact are perfect for personal or business
scheduling and contact management. I actually use both of these applications.
I work with Entourage for e-mail contact management because it is so automatic
and integrated
with my e-mail application, and I use the Now product for my main contact management
and scheduling. Apparently there is nothing comparable in the Windows world for
individuals, although PowerOn Software, the makers of Now Contact/Now Up-to-Date,
have a Windows version in beta testing (www.poweronsoftware.com). This week
Apple released its latest iApp - iCal. iCal is a calendar application that has
all the virtues of iApps such as iMovie or iTunes in that it is simple, handy,
innovative and free. And the colour-coded schedules make the application uniquely
attractive. iCal is designed so that as you explore its simple interface, you
discover that it is a powerful application. Like
other iApps, iCal breaks new ground with features rarely available outside the
corporate environment. Most spectacular of these is its ability to publish your
calendar on the Internet or on a network so the other people who are part of your
schedule can refer to it on the Internet and add their own scheduling changes.
You can also "subscribe" to the other people's calendars and your iCal
will find them and check regularly for changes. For most people, this will require
having a .Mac - dotMac - account. iCal,
along with Apple's new Address Book application, introduces OS-level contact management
and schedule linking. This means if you are scheduling a meeting, you can select
from your database those you want to attend and they will be e-mailed an invitation
from within your calendar program. OS-level contact management also allows other
applications to utilise your master contact list instead of having to have a separate
database. iCal
and Address Book are also designed to synchronise with different hand-held devices,
but they require another application called iSync, which will be available later
this month. Until then, you can still manually sync your Palm or iPod by using
vCal-format import and export. When iSync arrives, and if you have a Bluetooth-connected
device, your Mac will automatically find and update your hand-held each time you
walk near it. As
is traditional with Apple's iApps, the first version usually lacks a feature or
two and iCal is no exception. First, it does not support double clicking on banner-type
events or any event that lasts all day. This is a bug. If you want to edit one
of those events, you have to delete it and enter it again. You also cannot assign
or reassign events using drag and drop. This is particularly a problem after importing
your events from another calendar application that does not have colour-coded
items. On
the subject of importing, iCal does not yet import from Now Up to Date, the most
popular Mac calendar, although there is a workaround involving importing into
Entourage and then exporting to iCal. And iCal lists appointments using a 24-hour
clock, which is fine for military fighter pilots but not useful for regular people.
I also found the contrast of the interface too weak, making it hard to read.
It works only
in OS 10.2, which means that iCal will cost money if you do not already have the
latest version of the OS. But
all in all, it is a very impressive version one, and there is nothing I've discovered
that would keep me from using it, especially when you consider some of its delightful
and unique features. Realistically,
most people do not have Bluetooth phones or online family calendars yet, but iCal
stands on its own, even if it did not have these futuristic features. And since
these technologies will become more broadly available, I believe that Apple has
laid the groundwork for making the Mac's digital hub a more essential part of
our lives. E-mail
Dave Horrigan at horrigan@electriciti.com
with your Mac queries.
7. Time to heed Greenspan's fiscal advice JAKE
VAN DER KAMP, SCMP Sep 14, 2002 Today I shall start by twisting the facts
for you. How lucky we are that United States Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan's
warnings on Thursday about fiscal discipline need not apply so strenuously to
us in Hong Kong just yet. Referring
to a United States federal deficit now running at US$192 billion a year (it was
an annual surplus of US$270 billion little more than year earlier), Mr Greenspan
told members of the House of Representatives that restoring fiscal discipline
must be a high priority. "History
suggests that an abandonment of fiscal discipline will eventually push up interest
rates, crowd out capital spending, lower productivity growth and force harder
choices upon us in the future," he said. ".
. . Without clear direction and constructive goals, the built-in political bias
in favour of budget deficits likely will again become entrenched," he added,
calling for a renewal of rules to enforce budget discipline. You
can understand his worries when you look at the first chart. On the bottom line,
you can see the record of the US fiscal deficit, now running at 5.3 per cent of
US gross domestic product. How lucky we are in contrast, as the chart shows, that
our own fiscal deficit is still only 1.8 per cent of our GDP. Now
why is this a twisting of the facts? Simple. It is because I have twisted these
two lines around. It is actually Hong Kong that has a fiscal deficit of 5.3 per
cent of GDP while the US figure is only 1.8 per cent. So
if this 1.8 per cent is enough to make Mr Greenspan warn US legislators about
the need for fiscal prudence, why have our own monetary and budget authorities
done no more than remind wastrels in our government that they have become a little
profligate at a 5.3 per cent deficit? This calls for a thunder of rebuke, not
just a few mild reproaches. Of course I can also offer evidence in mitigation
for them. As the second chart shows, US federal debt now runs at about 60 per
cent of GDP. We in contrast have net government savings equivalent to about 53
per cent of GDP. Unlike the US, we have a cushion to absorb a period of deficit
spending. There
are two difficulties with this cushion, however. The first is that a cushion is
something you sleep on and if our government falls asleep on this one, it may
wake up in a few years to find the cushion gone. We would do well to remember
it now. The
second is that we have a vast unfunded liability for civil service pensions. The
existing civil service pension reserve fund with assets of HK$11.7 billion will
cover only a small fraction of it. I
shall leave to the actuaries exactly how much more would really be needed if we
are not to pay out these liabilities from operating revenues, but all the estimates
I have heard run into hundreds of billions. Those free fiscal assets we boast
of may in reality be a good deal smaller than we think. Yes,
it is time to listen to Mr Greenspan. Email
Jake van der Kamp at jakeva@scmp.com.
8. Unreasonable art of investing CHET
CURRIER of Bloomberg, SCMP Sep 14, 2002
Something in
the minds of smart people does not love the stock market. Listen to the wise heads
speaking out about the dangers of bargain-hunting in stocks even now, at prices
far below what you had to pay two or three years ago. "Stocks stink,"
the revered bond mutual fund manager Bill Gross says. The
idea that stocks, with their capacity for benefiting from economic growth, can
be counted on to return more in the long run than other types of investments is
"unrealistic" and "based on a flawed conventional view", say
the esteemed financial thinkers Rob Arnott and Peter Bernstein. What
is striking is how neatly these comments fit in with a centuries-old tradition
of uneasiness and suspicion towards stocks among the world's finest minds.
The origins
of this may have something to do with the fact that brain power has never translated
reliably into success in equity investing. Sir Isaac Newton, sometimes described
as the smartest person ever, dropped a bundle in the 1720 debacle known as the
South Sea Bubble. Mark Twain, sometimes described as the greatest United States
writer ever, suffered investment losses in the 1890s that drove him deeply into
debt. The
stock market's behaviour can be so "irrational", to use the word applied
to it in the roaring 1990s by Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan, among others.
Take something
solid like a bond and you can gauge its default risks, calculate its yield to
maturity, analyse whether it is priced attractively relative to other similar,
knownquantities. A
sharp mind gives you a big edge. With stocks, after you do the analysis, you still
have no way of gauging where the whims of the market will carry you. Stock
traders get all worked up about nutty events such as splits, in which a company
swaps you two shares worth US$5 for one that sold for US$10. The total absence
of new value added does not matter as long as the "psychology" surrounding
the investment gets juiced up. Investment
theory, no matter how brilliant, can be tough to put into practice. Harry
Markowitz won a 1990 Nobel Prize for his pioneering work on the sophisticated
principles most investing institutions employ today. A few years later, when this
apostle of mean-variance models was asked how he was investing his retirement
funds, he wasquoted
as saying: "I split my contributions 50-50 between bonds and equities."
Genius
can be sidetracked by a matter as simple as diversification, one of the best and
most versatile tools available to investors for protecting against risk.
"It is
easy to buy and diversify at the time of investment," says David Lee, managing
director at Ferrell Asset Management in Singapore. "The trouble in this new
interlinked and globalised world of cyber-finance is to find securities that have
constantly and consistently low or negative correlation." Stock-market
folk wisdom tends to downgrade the value of intelligence. "Never
confuse brains with a rising market," runs one enduring adage. Bull
markets are said to thrive on the "greater fool theory", under which
one can happily buy a stock without bothering to do much analysis. Just find someone
even more benighted to sell it to at a higher price after a decent interval has
passed. Warren
Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway, the "oracle of Omaha" known for his frequent
zingers about the follies that befall the stock market, said at his company's
annual meeting in May: "We don't think returns are going to be terrible.
We just think people whose expectations have been built up by the bull market
will be disappointed. There's nothing wrong with earning 6 per cent or 7 per cent
on your money." The
stock market certainly has its flaws. In one sense, though, it is beautifully
egalitarian. The smartest people do not know any better than the rest of us what
is going to happen next. |