| News
Stories: |
 |
Click-on
these handy "jump links" to quickly access the news item you're
looking for.
1.
Arts hub carved up to satisfy the public, says Hui
2.
1 in 8 comment cards on hub the same
3.
Developer that wins project is in line for $40b in
sales
4.
Developer faces bill of $6b in land cost
5.
Henderson still keen on West Kowloon tender
6.
Hui fails to allay project fears
1. Arts hub carved up to satisfy the public, says
Hui
CHLOE LAI, SCMP 8 October 2005

Click to Enlarge
The
unpopular single-developer approach for the West Kowloon Cultural
District was officially scrapped yesterday after months of wrangling
and speculation, in what Chief Secretary Rafael Hui Si-yan said
was a move to "satisfy public demands".
But
the revised plan immediately ran into a barrage of criticism from
legislators, who called it a single tender in disguise.
Critics
were also upset that the huge canopy from the original Lord Foster
design would be kept and complained that the government remained
uncommitted to developing a cultural policy before proceeding with
the project.
"The
government will improve the plan to satisfy the public's demands
and give the people of Hong Kong a world-class cultural hub,"
Mr Hui said.
"We
will abolish the single tender, lower the development density, significantly
reduce the residential development and demand that the winning bidder
gives money for the arts hub's operation."
In
measures approved by the Executive Council on Tuesday, the winner
chosen from the three shortlisted bidders will be in charge of the
master plan instead of building and operating the entire 40-hectare
waterfront site.
The
winner will directly control only 65 per cent of the site, with
at least 30 per cent reserved for arts and cultural facilities.
It
will also have to fork out at least $30 billion to set up a trust
fund to pay for the operation of the arts facilities and a new statutory
body that will run them. The fund will also cover maintenance of
the canopy, an automated people-mover and open space.
Speaking
at a meeting of the Legislative Council House Committee, Mr Hui
also announced the expected new restrictions on the project, which
limit the plot ratio governing development density to 1.81 and carve
out at least half of the profit-making area for sale to other developers.
The
three shortlisted bidders have until the end of January to decide
whether they want to participate in the modified plan.
Mr
Hui promised they would have time to revise their proposals.
If
two drop out, the government will start the project all over again.
Mr
Hui said that as the new plan was a continuation of the one the
government had announced earlier, the project would not be opened
to new participants at this stage. And as public opinion on the
Lord Foster canopy was "inconclusive", it would remain
in the plan at this stage.
Although
the method for selling the carved-out land has not been decided,
Secretary for Housing, Planning and Lands Michael Suen Ming-yeung
said it was likely to be carried out either through the government
or the new statutory body.
The
winning company will be prohibited from bidding for the carved-out
land and will be barred from buying any property built there before
the arts hub project is completied.
Mr
Hui also promised that the Town Planning Board would be consulted.
Democratic
Party chairman Lee Wing-tat said: "The government appears to
be listening to public opinion; but it is twisting public opinion.
It is changing the project from a super-single-tender approach to
a big-single-tender approach."
Alan
Leong Kah-kit, of the Article 45 Concern Group, described the new
plan as "even worse than the original one as the winning bidder
will be spared from operating the arts hub".
Mr
Leong, who chairs the Legco subcommittee on the West Kowloon Cultural
Development, said: "The government is not responding to the
anxiety of the public about the single-developer approach. It shows
the government doesn't consider this is a cultural project."
2. 1 in 8 comment cards on hub the same
FELIX CHAN and CHLOE LAI, SCMP 8 October
2005
More
than 4,000 of the 33,000-plus comment cards members of the public
posted to show which of the shortlisted West Kowloon Cultural Project
designs they preferred were in identical envelopes and contained
similar answers.
The
revelation appears to lend substance to shortlisted bidder Henderson
Land's questioning of the credibility of public polling on the plans.
The
government-commissioned consultation, conducted by Polytechnic University's
Public Policy Research Institute, had three components: comment
cards from the exhibition of the shortlisted proposals; written
submissions and views expressed at forums/meetings; and three telephone
polls.
A
total of 33,416 comment cards, with answers to 13 questions, were
received. Of these, 4,176 were posted using an identical envelope
or mailing label and contained similar answers.
The
institute's Peter Yuen Pok-man said over 90 per cent of the suspect
cards favoured the plans of one of the three bidders - the one which
received the strongest public support. The plans' authors were not
identified in the consultation, and the government would not say
which plan was involved.
Deputy
Secretary for Housing, Planning and Lands Au King-chi said even
after discarding the suspicious comment cards, the plan they overwhelmingly
favoured still came out top. She said there were no rules for public
consultation exercises barring individuals or organisations from
submitting multiple copies of formatted responses.
"One
has to understand that it is not like voting in an election, where
you need to show your identity cards at the poll stations to collect
your ballot papers," she said.
A
spokeswoman for developer Henderson Land said on Sunday that it
was aware that some corporations used buses to send some "related"
people to the West Kowloon Cultural District project exhibition
halls and that those visitors had also filled out the consultation
forms.
Another
bidder, Dynamic Star, last night said it would not comment on the
suspicious comment cards, calling it a matter between the government
and those filling out the cards.
As
for the telephone polling, in which 4,553 people were polled, 61
per cent supported building a cultural district on the West Kowloon
waterfront, with only 10 per cent against it. More than 75 per cent
of the respondents believed the project could enhance Hong Kong's
culture and arts development and tourism industry, and 72 per cent
felt it could improve employment. However, half were against the
now-abandoned single-developer approach.
On
the sensitive issue of the canopy, 51 per cent of those polled favoured
its construction, with 18 per cent against. Public support for the
canopy was in contrast to the fierce opposition to its construction
contained in the majority of the 623 written submissions received
on the project.
Long-term
vision on a grand scale
Early
1998 Hong Kong Tourism Association commissions a study on a new
performance venue
September
1998 It tells the Legislative Council's home affairs panel that
venues are urgently needed
October
1998 In his policy address, chief executive Tung Chee-hwa announces
plans to build a giant venue on the West Kowloon reclamation area
February
1999 A tourism association study reiterates the need and pinpoints
5.5 hectares at West Kowloon
October
1999 Mr Tung reaffirms his plans and announces a competition to
revitalise Victoria Harbour
November
16, 1999 The Executive Council orders a review of the use of a southern
part of the West Kowloon reclamation
April
2001 Government launches the West Kowloon reclamation concept plan
competition
February
2002 Lord Foster's canopy concept declared the winner
September
2002 A steering committee for the scheme is set up, chaired by then
chief secretary Donald Tsang Yam-kuen
June
2003 Exco is consulted about a planned invitation for proposals
for the project
September
2003 Government invites tenders for the project, including developing
and managing cultural facilities and the sale and leasing of residential
and commercial land
November 2003 Legco calls for a comprehensive review of the scheme
Early
November 2004 Exco approves shortlisting of three of five tenders
November
10, 2004 Government publishes the shortlist and announces a public
consultation
January
5, 2005 Legco passes a motion asking for the scrapping of a single-developer
approach and setting up of a statutory body to develop and run cultural
facilities
September,
2005 Legco members visit Bilbao, Spain, to see the impact of the
Guggenheim Museum
October
7, 2005 Chief Secretary Rafael Hui Si-yan announces the new plan
for est Kowloon
End
of January 2006 The three shortlisted bidders must inform the government
if they still want to participate in the project
April-June
2006 Public consultation on creating a statutory body to run project's
cultural facilities
June-July
2006 Government will submit bill to set up a statutory body
Early
2007 Statutory body to begin work
3. Developer that wins project is in line for $40b in sales
PEGGY SITO and ANDY CHENG, SCMP 8 October
2005
The
developer that wins the West Kowloon project will rack up nearly
$40 billion in property sales under the revised plan unveiled yesterday,
according to surveyors.
While
they believed the profit margin for the winning bidder would be
reduced under the revised plan, the surveyors said the project remained
attractive because of its scale.
Property
agent Centaline said that under the amended proposal there would
be 1.95 million sq ft of commercial and office space and 780,000
sq ft of residential space. With an estimated selling price of $13,000
per sq ft for office space and $18,000 per sq ft for flats, sales
would generate revenue of $39.4 billion assuming all find buyers.
The
property consultant said it was difficult to estimate the profits
the winning consortium would earn.
"This
is because we do not know the cost of building a canopy and other
construction costs," it said.
Jones
Lang LaSalle regional director Lau Chun-kong said the profit margin
was bound to drop under the amended plan. But he also believed the
West Kowloon Cultural District remains attractive taking into account
its scale.
"The
government must make the project financially viable. If not, no
developer will be interested in it," he said.
Christine
Loh Kung-wai, chief executive of the think-tank Civic Exchange,
said the successful bidder could achieve a profit margin of 50 per
cent on revenue of $70 billion from the project. She said the calculation
was based on the fact that property in West Kowloon was fetching
$20,000 per sq ft and construction costs would be relatively low.
Land
prices in West Kowloon have been increasing on the back of better-than-expected
results in the government's recently resumed land auctions.
A
Sino Land-led consortium last month beat out at least six other
parties to buy a site at Hoi Ting Road near Olympic Station in Tai
Kok Tsui for $3.19 billion, and splashed $2.73 billion on an adjacent
site.
The
prices were both well above top-end market estimates of $2.8 billion
and $2.4 billion respectively.
Sino
Land, a bidder for the West Kowloon Cultural District project, owns
50 per cent of the venture, with the rest shared equally by Chinese
Estates Holdings and Nan Fung Development.
4. Developer faces bill of $6b in land cost
ERNEST KONG, SCMP 8 October 2005
Henderson
Land Development expects to spend around $6 billion in land premiums
for converting an agricultural site in Wu Kai Sha into a residential
project.
Lee
Shau-kee, chairman of the largest agricultural land holder among
local developers, said the company would speed up the process of
negotiating the land premium payments for converting the land bank.
The
estimated cost for converting its Wu Kai Sha site into a residential
development with a maximum gross floor area of about 3.5 million
sq ft is about $2,000 per square foot according to current market
price which would mean around $6 billion, said Mr Lee.
"But
we haven't reached any agreement with the government yet,"
he added.
According
to the company's annual results, Henderson Land acquired 4.3 million
sq ft of farm land for the financial year ended on 30 June.
Meanwhile,
Henderson Land vice-chairman Colin Lam Ko-yin said the developer
was selling about $3 billion worth of non-core investment properties,
including four storeys of offices at 9 Queen's Road bought in October
last year, six office buildings and about 700 parking spaces in
separate residential projects.
In
response to recent reports that some Hong Kong developers had broken
mainland foreign exchange rules by not repatriating all their foreign
exchange earnings from overseas sales, Mr Lam said they had already
settled the problem with China's State Administration of Foreign
Exchange.
"It
was a technical problem, as our earnings were allowed to be expatriated
from the mainland in the first place," said Mr Lam.
When
asked if the firm had already paid the penalty for breaking the
foreign exchange rules, Mr Lam said: "The amount of money involved
is insignificant," without further explaining if a penalty
was imposed on the developer.
5. Henderson still keen on West Kowloon tender
Teddy Ng and Monday Ng, The Standard 8 October
2005
Henderson
Land, one of the three short- listed bidders for the West Kowloon
arts hub, said it is still interested in participating in the tender
even though the government has now decided to abolish the single-developer
approach.
Henderson
Land, one of the three short- listed bidders for the West Kowloon
arts hub, said it is still interested in participating in the tender
even though the government has now decided to abolish the single-developer
approach.
The
other two bidders said they respected the government's decision.
Lee Shau-kee, chairman of Henderson Land, which owns bidder World
City Culture Park, said the government's new proposal had balanced
the interests of various sectors and could help soothe the differences
that arose from the single-developer approach.
"We
have put a lot of effort into the project so we are still interested
even though there will not be much profit," he said. "It
is for the good of Hong Kong."
Lee
admitted that the proposed plot ratio of 1.81 is very low when compared
with the company's 2.5 proposal - the lowest among the three bidders.
Dynamic
Star International, a consortium of Sun Hung Kai Properties and
Cheung Kong (Holdings), had proposed a plot ratio of 3.28, while
Sunny Development, a joint venture comprising Sino Land, Wharf (Holdings)
and Chinese Estates Holdings, had a 4.33 ratio.
Lee
said the controversial giant canopy covering the whole area is still
a must for the sake of tourism. He said profit is not the sole motive
in the investment. "We might still do it even if there is no
profit," he said.
The
other two bidders said further discussion and studies are necessary
before they can commit themselves.
Sun
Hung Kai Properties executive director Eric Chow said the plot ratio
proposed by the government was different from that proposed by Dynamic
Star International. He said the company needed to study the new
plan with its partner before deciding on whether to participate
in the tender.
He
said it is difficult to say whether the newly proposed conditions
are attractive to developers, but the company will respect the government's
decision.
"The
single developer approach may have had some advantages. But the
government needed to consider other factors and arrive at a balance
between them," he said.
"We
respect and agree with the government's decision."
Chow
said the West Kowloon Cultural District project is not a commercial
development and business interests should not be the sole consideration
in assessing the project.
He
said it is more important that the project meets the needs of the
public and the cultural sector, and whether it truly represents
Hong Kong.
A
Sunny Development spokesman said the company will respect the government's
proposal.
A
spokesman for Swire Properties, whose tender was rejected, said
the company had no further comment.
"We
have expressed our viewpoints and it is now up to the government
and the general public to decide what they want for Hong Kong and
what is best for Hong Kong," the Swire spokesman said.
6. Hui fails to allay project fears
Cannix Yau and Carrie Chan, The Standard
8 October 2005
Lawmakers
have accused an embattled Chief Secretary for Administration Rafael
Hui of retaining "in disguise" a plan to allow a single
developer to take over the West Kowloon cultural hub project by
empowering the successful bidder to "pick and choose"
the best land slots.
Lawmakers
have accused an embattled Chief Secretary for Administration Rafael
Hui of retaining "in disguise" a plan to allow a single
developer to take over the West Kowloon cultural hub project by
empowering the successful bidder to "pick and choose"
the best land slots.
Hui
took over the project from Donald Tsang after the latter became
chief executive, and earlier this week made public a scaled-down
proposal for the development of the 40-hectare harborfront at the
southern tip of the West Kowloon reclamation into what the government
calls a "world-class cultural district."
The
new proposal seeks to allay fears that the government has colluded
with the business sector by limiting the land open to a single developer
to 20 hectares and opening up the other half to participation by
multiple developers.
Under
the revised proposal, one of the three short-listed bidders would
thus win sole-development rights to at least half of the residential
and commercial land of at least 250,000 square meters, with the
remaining land to be divided into various slots for open tender
to other developers.
The
three finalists are Henderson Land's World City Culture Park; a
joint bid by Cheung Kong (Holdings) and Sun Hung Kai Properties
called Dynamic Star International; and Sunny Development, a consortium
of Sino Land, Wharf Holdings and Chinese Estates Holdings.
The
successful bidder, responsible for the site's cultural development,
will have to commit HK$30 billion into an independent trust fund
for building and maintaining the not-for-profit cultural facilities,
which must take up at least 30 percent, or about 185,000 square
meters, of the project area.
A
controversial mega canopy costing HK$5 billion to HK$10 billion,
expected to cover 55 percent of the cultural district, will also
go ahead despite overwhelming disapproval by 70 percent of those
who made about 30,000 submissions to the government. Announcing
the proposal at the Legislative Council, Hui said it would be inappropriate
for the government to scrap the canopy, which emerged from a design
competition largely dominated by British architect Norman Foster.
"This
was a mandatory requirement in the original proposal. Now we put
forward a new proposal. We need to see the response of the three
bidders and their financial portfolios before reviewing the need
for the canopy," Hui said.
"Since
we are not at the screening stage, it's too early for us to decide
whether to retain it or not."
He
also acknowledged that the successful bidder will be allowed to
select the ideal sites within the project's development before the
remainder of the land is put to open tender because the winner needs
to assume the role of coordinating the project to ensure efficient
integration of design and a clear line of responsibility.
Alan
Leong, chairman of Legco's subcommittee on the cultural district,
said the government has failed to address concerns raised in his
panel's report about carving up the project to encourage more participation
by interested parties.
Hui
insisted he had responded to the public calls by scrapping the single-
developer approach.
But
he said: "If the project is shared by too many developers,
I am afraid it may affect the overall planning. As a result, the
overall management could be less efficient, less cost-effective
and the development time longer."
Chan
Yuen-han of the Federation of Trade Unions also questioned whether
the successful bidder will be able to override the government's
decisions on the whole project because the bidder will have a decisive
say over how to divide the remaining half.
The
Democratic Party's James To also accused the government of wishing
to turn the successful bidder into the "colonial governor"
of the remaining half of the site.
Hui
pledged the government will impose stringent conditions on overall
planning, style and quality standards, and will strictly monitor
development work.
Hui
said he believes the HK$30 billion trust fund will be self-sufficient
to sustain the overall building, maintaining and operating costs,
generating an annual return of HK$600 million.
"So
the surplus of land proceeds and other revenue generated from commercial
development might likely flow back to the Treasury," Hui said.
The
government has also proposed a wide-ranging West Kowloon authority
comprising representatives from Legco, arts and cultural circles,
tourism industry, property sector, financial services, town planning,
architecture and surveying sectors, for monitoring and managing
the development project.
If
the government fails to receive a positive response from at least
two of the three short-listed bidders by January on the new proposal,
the whole project will go back to the drawing board.
If
at least two respond positively, the government will develop the
proposed conditions into specific requirements after a detailed
financial and feasibility study, initiate amendments to the outline
zoning plan with the Town Planning Board and invite the interested
bidders to revise their proposals accordingly.
The
government will then put forward a proposal for setting up the West
Kowloon authority with stipulated powers and functions for public
consultation by mid-2006, followed by a bill to be tabled in Legco
next July for enactment by the end of next year.
The
new conditions also stipulate a standard plot ratio of 1.81 for
commercial and residential development, with the latter comprising
20 percent, or 144,000 square meters, of the site.
The
three bidding consortia have submitted development plans with plot
ratios of 4.33, 3.28 and 2.5.
Leong
blasted the new proposal as worse than the old one.
"This
is a continuation of the single- developer approach. The new proposal
simply fails to address the grave concerns stated in the Legco's
report about this problematic approach," he said.
"This
is even worse than the original proposal because the successful
bidder can pick and choose the best land slots before leaving the
undesirable slots to other bidders. The chosen developer can leave
the scene after building the facilities with the West Kowloon authority
bearing all the responsibility.
"So
far I can't see any long-term strategic planning for arts and cultural
development. I can't see how construction of the canopy can enhance
the long- term cultural development," he said.
Institute
of Surveyors president Cheung Tat-tong said the project bidder could
earn more than HK$10 billion in profit even with a reduced plot
ratio.
|