| News
Stories: |  |
Click-on these
handy "jump links" to quickly access the news item you're looking
for. 1.
Stanley pier planned to ease traffic 2.
Liao vows to consider all parties in rail plan 3.
Cash, share rail buy proposed 4.
Dragages' bid offers value for money: Tien Keith Wallis
1. Stanley pier planned to ease traffic CHOW
CHUNG-YAN, SCMP 31 October 2002 A
pier will be built at Stanley to encourage more people to travel by boat and boost
tourism. Secretary
for the Environment, Transport and Works Sarah Liao Sau-tung told legislators
yesterday construction work on the pier, opposite Murray House, would start in
2004 if Legco approved the project, with completion due by 2006. She
said the pier would be part of a series of tourism developments at Stanley and
would help ease traffic congestion. "The
pier will be designed specially for leisure and sightseeing boats," Dr Liao
said. "It will also cater for other kinds of sea transport. We expect it
will attract more companies to hold functions in Stanley and provide an alternative
means of transport." Tommy
Cheung Yu-yan, representing the catering constituency, said restaurants and shops
at Stanley would benefit. He
said many tourists shunned Stanley because of traffic congestion during holidays.
The Tourism Board
chairwoman, legislator Selina Chow Liang Shuk-yee, urged the government to privatise
the construction to improve efficiency. Secretary for Economic Development and
Labour Stephen Ip Shu-kwan said he would consider the idea. Southern
District councillor Benny Chu Chu-yin said the council was briefed two months
ago and had approved the plan.
2. Liao vows to consider all parties in rail plan DENISE
TSANG, SCMP 31 October 2002 The
government will take into consideration the views of MTR Corp (MTRC), Kowloon-Canton
Railway Corp (KCRC) and investment banks over a controversial rail merger proposal,
a senior official has pledged. Sarah
Liao Sau-tung, Secretary for the Environment, Transport and Works, yesterday said
the government was neutral about merging the SAR's rail operators into one entity.
Dr Liao's pledge
follows the news on Tuesday of KCRC's contentious views on the possible merger,
in stark contrast to MTRC's support. KCRC
chairman Michael Tien Puk-sun said the corporation was opposed to the merger because
it would bring insignificant cost savings and leave competition with buses unresolved.
It is understood
that the government-owned KCRC is pushing the government for a sole listing rather
than a merger with semi-privatised MTRC. Analysts
and investment bankers broadly believe the government will give the go-ahead to
a merger in an attempt to plug the HK$56 billion fiscal deficit. ING
Financial Markets analyst Peter Williamson said: "We believe a merger of
MTRC with KCRC is likely. "A
merger would create shareholder value and be an attractive proposition for the
government." An
investment bank director who handled MTRC's listing in 2000 said: "If KCRC
goes public now or next year it will defeat the purpose of maximising proceeds
from selling government assets to fill the deficit. But it's interesting that
KCRC has chosen a high-profile way to [oppose]." This
means this year and next would not be an ideal time for KCRC's listing in the
face of the poor stock market and an estimated HK$120 billion spending on new
KCRC projects in the next 10 to 15 years. Gary
Chan, a Nomura International (Hong Kong) analyst, said: "While KCRC gave
some reasons for its position, we believe unspoken reasons underpin the company's
statement." Mr
Chan, who expected MTRC to buy KCRC by issuing new shares and cash, believed the
government was keen to realise cash from the KCRC, even at a steep discount to
boost the attractiveness of MTRC's shares. Mr
Williamson estimated MTRC might pay the government HK$24.45 billion for KCRC,
half of which might come from borrowings and the remainder from new shares. He
said the deal might boost the government's shareholding in the enlarged entity
to 82 per cent compared with an existing 76.6 per cent in MTRC. He
thought the government might be able to raise HK$33 billion by reducing its stake
to 51 per cent at MTRC's present prices. The government had planned to raise HK$15
billion from selling the second tranche of MTRC shares this year, but this was
put on hold until the merger study was completed. Mr
Williamson believed the merger would be positive for MTRC as its net debt to equity
ratio would be reduced to 39.2 per cent from 57.6 per cent owing to KCRC's net
cash position.
3. Cash, share rail buy proposed Staff
reporter, The Standard 31 October 2002 The
Mass Transit Railway Corp could offer to take over Kowloon-Canton Railway Corporation
in a cash and share buyout, sources said. The
government would reap a large lump sum of money under such an acquisition proposal,
which could help reduce the government's ballooning deficit, the Hong Kong Economic
Times reported. An
MTR Corp spokeswoman said a feasibility study on the merger was still continuing.
``It's still too early. We haven't gone into the details yet,'' she said. The
KCRC on Tuesday publicly opposed a merger of the two railway operators. Other
sources said the KCRC could seek a listing in the fourth quarter of 2003 to counter
the MTR Corp proposal. The KCRC initially planned to go public by 2006. On
Tuesday, KCRC chairman Michael Tien said the board was opposed to the government's
merger plans. The
MTR Corp supports a merger. But
should the government decide to go ahead with a merger, the KCRC would not be
in any position to oppose it, government sources said, as it is a fully-owned
by the government. Secretary
for the Environment, Transport and Works Sarah Liao said the government had yet
to make a decision. ``We are open-minded,'' she said yesterday. The government
was studying the details and waiting for a consultant's report.
4. Dragages' bid offers value for money: Tien Keith Wallis The
Standard 31 October 2002 The
Kowloon-Canton Railway Corporation (KCRC) yesterday staunchly defended its decision
to award a HK$2.8 billion tunnelling contract to the highest bidder, saying the
deal represented the best value for money. On
Tuesday, The Standard revealed in an exclusive report that French contractor Dragages
et Travaux Publics had won the contract even though its tender was significantly
higher than the cheapest bid lodged by local firm Chun Wo Construction and Engineering
in a joint venture with Italian contractor Impregilo. Dragages
offered the best technical solution for the price, KCRC chairman Michael Tien
said yesterday, while refusing to give details of the bid by Chun Wo/Impregilo. He
said there was a comprehensive marking system that allocated 50 per cent of the
bid assessment for the technical and design submission and 50 per cent on price. ``Dragages
scored higher technically, but lower financially. According to a pre-determined
formula, Dragages came out on top,'' Tien said. Democratic
Party infrastructure spokesman Albert Chan told The Standard it was difficult
to criticise procedures and methods used by the KCRC because they had been scrutinised
by the Independent Commission Against Corruption. But
he said the history of the project, with KCRC initially planning to negotiate
a contract with Dragages, meant there was public disquiet about the result of
the open tender. In
a meeting with Tien yesterday, Chan proposed the KCRC appoint an independent committee
``to look at the tender documents to see if it would agree with KCRC's decision. ``But
Tien turned down the suggestion'', Chan said. KCRC
chief executive Yeung Kai-yin confirmed that the corporation initially planned
to negotiate a contract with Dragages when plans for a tunnel under the Long Valley
between Sheung Shui and Chau Tau were proposed last year. This followed the rejection
of a planned viaduct by the Environmental Protection Department. ``In
the event, the managing board decided upon an open tender,'' Yeung said. He
confirmed that Dragages produced designs and specifications that were later used
as part of the open tender. Asked
if Dragages was given an understanding that it would win the bid in the open tender,
Yeung said: ``Definitely not. We did not enter into an agreement. Dragages had
to compete using the same specifications.'' Tien
denied he had executed a U-turn on a possible merger between the KCRC and the
MTR Corp, after saying on Tuesday the board had told the government it was against
such a move. His
previous comments, which suggested he was in favour of the two rail corporations
merging, represented a personal view, Tien said. |