| News
Stories: |
 |
Click-on
these handy "jump links" to quickly access the news item you're
looking for.
1.
Developer loses fight over SoHo renewal
2.
Cultural district plan under attack
3.
Shortlisted developer warns of delays if new bids
are sought
1. Developer loses fight over SoHo renewal
Albert Wong, The Standard 10 November
2005
One of Hong Kong's largest property
developers, Henderson Land, has lost a High Court battle against
an urban renewal project in the trendy SoHo area that was first
proposed eight years ago.
Since late 1997, the site, which
includes Staunton Street and Wing Lee Street, was designated a Comprehensive
Development Area covering 4,400 square meters.
The Urban Renewal Authority planned
to provide about 520 flats, 2,800 sqm of retail space, about 855
sqm of open space and a memorial square in honor of Sun Yat Sen,
who once lived in the area.
But various lots of property in
Staunton Street, Wa In Fong East and Cheung Wo Lane - all of which
were incorporated into the development area - are owned by Henderson
Land.
The property giant has been lobbying
the Town Planning Board to remove its properties from the scheme
since 2003.
Residents, meanwhile, who would
be eligible for redevelopment compensation, have been protesting
about delayed payouts.
Of 183 households that may be affected
by the project, 60 are on Henderson sites. More than 400 people
have written to the board to approve the renewal scheme.
The developer initiated its judicial
review after the Town Planning Board in March 2004 decided not to
accept their proposed amendments. Henderson claimed the board had
failed to balance the interests of private landowners.
Justice Carlye Chu Wednesday ruled
that the board is not an "appeals board" and does not
have the power nor the duty to adjudicate.
But residents will still have to
wait indefinitely for their payouts.
A spokesman for the Urban Renewal
Authority said the board has yet to complete its approval of the
scheme.
Even if there is no appeal by the
developer, the board will still have to submit its decision to the
Executive Council to await further approval before the authority
can acquire the land and pay residents.
After the publication by the Planning
and Lands Bureau of an "Urban Renewal Scheme" in 2001,
the SoHo area was put on the priority list for redevelopment.
In March 2003, the authority submitted
its draft plans to the board for consideration. Henderson Land made
its objections to the board in December 2003 and again the following
March. Their proposals were rejected.
In a judicial review, Henderson
Land claimed the interests of private property owners were being
unlawfully subsumed by the Urban Renewal Authority, especially since
the developer had already been given permission by the Building
Authority and the Town Planning Board itself to conduct its own
developments.
It further claimed the board had
been unreasonable in refusing to amend the scheme, since there was
no evidence to suggest that the removal of Henderson properties
would jeopardize it.
"The planning permission previously
approved by the board," for Henderson to conduct its own development,
"does not give rise to a presumption in favor of preserving
the applicants' rights," Chu ruled.
The board's opinion that the redevelopment
scheme is not viable without Henderson's properties "are matters
for planning judgment, which the board is entitled to take,"
the judge ruled.
She noted that the Urban Renewal
Authority is also obliged by law to take due care of its finances.
If the renewal scheme cannot proceed
and generate wealth for the authority, "public interest will
be affected in that there will not be urban renewal either in the
scheme area or other areas," she noted.
The Town Planning Board welcomed the ruling.
2. Cultural district plan under attack
Albert Wong, The Standard 10 November 2005
The government's West Kowloon Cultural
District could be facing more troubles as a legal challenge was
filed Wednesday objecting to the very foundations of the planning
process for the project.
The government's West Kowloon Cultural
District could be facing more troubles as a legal challenge was
filed Wednesday objecting to the very foundations of the planning
process for the project.
James Wong, a frequent critic of
the planning process, has applied for a judicial review of actions
taken on West Kowloon by the Town Planning Board.
The project's Outline Zoning Plan
adopted by the board grants a provisional agreement to an as-yet-
unnamed developer even before public consultation on the HK$40 billion
project is complete.
Democratic lawmaker Albert Ho, who
is backing Wong, said Wednesday that "the Town Planning Board
has effectively made itself a consultant to the government behind
closed doors."
This makes it impossible for the
board to give impartial consideration to any objection raised in
the subsequent public consultation process, according to a writ
made available in the High Court Wednesday.
The Town Planning Board acted unlawfully
when it adopted this "two- stage approach" which requires
the board "to give its agreement to a proposed development
scheme [on the West Kowloon reclamation site] before it has carried
out its statutory duty to hear and consider objections," the
writ said.
The effect of the approach is to
remove "all public input into the planning process" for
West Kowloon until a later stage when the proposal has already been
approved by both the board and the government.
"It is clear that this exclusion
of public participation is at variance with the legislative intent"
of the board's statutory duties, the writ said.
Furthermore, the board's statutory
function is for the "preparation of plans" and not "the
giving of agreement to a proposal," the writ claimed.
Ho said, given the "very serious
commitment" it makes in stage one, "the government is
unable to act fairly in stage two" when it is supposed to listen
to the views of the public and consider objections.
He hopes the judicial review will
force the authorities "to seriously reconsider the planning
procedure."
A spokesperson for the Town Planning
Board said it has yet to receive the writ but "will take appropriate
action accordingly."
The writ said: "The development
of the southernmost part of the West Kowloon reclamation is one
of the most important projects in modern Hong Kong. It will determine
the appearance of the central harborside area of the city for many
years."
But the proposals have so far been
"impermissibly uncertain and vague" with very limited
information in the public domain, it added.
Wong, who is a professional artist
and claims he will be affected by how the cultural district is handled,
has been submitting comments and alternative proposals for the area
since 2003.
In an "explanatory statement"
issued in July 2003, with the gazetting of rezoning of land into
"other specified use" the board made it known it would
be adopting a "two-stage approach" for the implementation
of "WKCD." In the first stage, states the "explanatory
statement," the preferred scheme will be submitted to the board
to enter into a "Provisional Agreement" without first
needing the approval of the chief executive in council and without
going through public consultation.
The writ claims that in the Town
Planning Board Ordinance, "it is clear from the provision for
exhibition of draft plans and consideration of objections that meaningful
public participation in the planning process is part of the legislative
intent.
"Against this statutory background,
the board has no power to agree a development proposal which has
not been exhibited and had objections to it considered."
By stage two, the provisional agreement
puts the board under "heavy pressure not to uphold any objections,
the writ said.
There has never been any explanation
for the "two-stage approach" and it has never been implemented
before, the writ claimed.
In any case, "the information
provided to the public about the operation of the two-stage procedure
is so limited" that the lack of clarity itself makes the procedure
unlawful, it said.
Before the current proposals, the
site had been earmarked for a waterfront park. In 1998, then chief
executive Tung Chee-hwa announced a "state-of- the-art performance
venue" for the site. Concept plans were submitted in 2001 followed
by invitations to developers for preliminary plans in 2003.
Last month, the government buckled
under pressure and announced a scaled-down proposal for the development
of the 40-hectare harborfront site at the southern tip of the West
Kowloon reclamation into what it calls a "world- class cultural
district."
The new proposal sought to allay
fears that the government colluded with big developers by limiting
the land open to a single developer to 20 hectares and opening up
the other half to multiple developers.
Under the revised proposal, one
of the three short-listed bidders will win sole-development rights
to at least half of the residential and commercial land, with the
remaining land put up for open tender.
The three finalists are Henderson
Land's World City Culture Park; a joint bid by Cheung Kong (Holdings)
and Sun Hung Kai Properties called Dynamic Star International; and
Sunny Development, a consortium of Sino Land, Wharf Holdings and
Chinese Estates Holdings.
3. Shortlisted developer warns of delays if new bids are sought
MAY CHAN, SCMP 10 November 2005

Sun Hung Kai chairman Walter Kwok Ping-shueng, centre,
shows Chief Executive
Donald Tsang, left, and the director of Beijing's liaison office
in Hong Kong, Gao Siren,
a model of the 118-storey tower. Picture by Robert Ng
Re-tendering
the West Kowloon Cultural District project will only cause further
delay, one of the shortlisted developers warned yesterday.
Thomas Kwok Ping-kwong, vice-chairman
of Sun Hung Kai Properties, also said there were still a lot of
uncertainties over the project, including design requirements and
the operation of a $30 billon trust fund for arts facilities.
"The West Kowloon project involves
complicated issues, and the preparation work for the tender will
take one to two years," he said.
Mr Kwok was speaking at the ground-breaking
ceremony for the International Commerce Centre, a 118-storey tower
which will be the tallest building in Hong Kong and third-tallest
in the world on its completion in 2010.
Hung Lung Properties chairman Ronnie
Chan Chi-chung demanded on Tuesday that the government order a new
round of tenders for the project.
The administration scrapped the
unpopular single-developer approach in September. However, the three
shortlisted proponents - Dynamic Star International, a Sun Hung
Kai Properties and Cheung Kong (Holdings) consortium; Sunny Development,
a joint venture between Sino Land, Wharf (Holdings) and Chinese
Estates Holdings; and World City Culture Park, a subsidiary of Henderson
Land - were allowed to go ahead bidding for the key parts of the
project.
However, Colin Lam Ko-yin, vice-chairman
of Henderson Land, was open to the possibility of re-tendering.
"The
site in West Kowloon is a very precious piece of land to the public,
and it involves huge investments," he said. "Detailed
studies to maximise its economic benefits may be worth pursuing."
|