Home Page
News Update
Events Calendar
Morning Briefing
About Us
Our Services
Partners
Contact Us  

2 December 2002
News Stories:December Headlines

Click-on these handy "jump links" to quickly access the news item
you're looking for.

1. LegCo to Debate Maintaining Infrastructural Investments

2. Zhuhai link will help us break HK's logistics cartel

3. Lack of leadership skills promotes gloomy vision

1. LegCo to Debate Maintaining Infrastructural Investments
Hong Kong Government, 2 December 2002

The following is issued on behalf of the Legislative Council Secretariat:

The Legislative Council will hold a meeting this Wednesday (December 4) at 2.30 pm in the Legislative Council Chamber. During the meeting, Members will debate a motion on maintaining infrastructural investments.

The motion, to be moved by Ir Dr Hon Raymond HO Chung-tai, says: "That, as the local economy remains in the doldrums and the unemployment rate is high, this Council urges the Government to adhere to its commitment to infrastructural investments, and to invest in the coming five years an amount no less than the total funding of about $147 billion earmarked for public works projects, i.e. an average annual expenditure of around $29.4 billion for the period 2002-03 to 2006-07, as stated in the Financial Secretary's letter dated 17 October 2002 to the Chairman of this Council's Public Works Subcommittee; furthermore, in reviewing the allocation of resources for public works projects, the Government should not only focus on the economic benefits generated by the projects concerned, but must also take into account their social benefits, as well as their effectiveness in stimulating the economy and providing more employment opportunities."

Hon Albert CHAN Wai-yip will move an amendment to Ir Dr Hon Raymond HO Chung-tai's motion.

Members will also debate a motion proposed by Dr Hon LUI Ming-wah on desalination. His motion says: "That this Council urges the Government to expeditiously mobilize scientific and technological personnel and provide funding for research on the latest desalination technology and equipment, with a view to solving in the long run the problem with the source of potable water for Hong Kong and easing the resultant financial burden, and facilitating the development of the desalination equipment manufacturing industry, as well as promoting economic development."

Hon Fred LI Wah-ming will move an amendment to Dr Hon LUI Ming-wah's motion.

On bills, the Housing (Amendment) Bill 2002 and the Education (Amendment) Bill 2002 will be introduced into the Council for First and Second Readings. Second Reading debates on these bills will be adjourned.

During the meeting, Members will ask the Government 20 questions on various policy areas, six of which require oral replies.

The agenda of the above meeting can be obtained via the Legislative Council InfoFax Service (Tel: 2869 9568) or the Legislative Council web site (http://www.legco.gov.hk).

Members of the public are welcome to observe the proceedings of the meeting from the public galleries of the Legislative Council Chamber. They may reserve seats by calling 2869 9399 during office hours. Seats will be allocated on a first-come-first-served basis.

2. Zhuhai link will help us break HK's logistics cartel
JAKE VAN DER KAMP, SCMP 2 December 2002

It is hill-walking season again and this year I am resolved once more to hike that splendid trail to Fan Lau and Tai O on Lantau Island. It may be the last time I can do it with only wind and birds around and no intrusive reminders of a big city nearby.

In a year or two the noisy pile-drivers will be in clear evidence along half of that trail as construction starts on the new bridge from Zhuhai to Tai O. As an enthusiast of Hong Kong's natural splendours, I regret it.

But if I were to put on an economist's hat I would have to welcome it. I would even welcome construction of that proposed container port northeast of Tai O. At least there is not much on that side of Lantau but burnt-out hillside and aircraft noise.

I would have to welcome it because the bridge and the port together could go a long way to cracking a lucrative logistics cartel that has become a drag on the entire Pearl River Delta's drive to become one of the world's most price-competitive manufacturing centres.

What is the proper price for the right to build and operate a container port? You might say that such a right in Hong Kong is worth billions. I say it should be worth one dollar and no more. If prospective operators are willing to pay more than one dollar then I say we should just designate some land for more container berths until no one wants to bid for one any longer.

Think about it. Any company that bids HK$10 billion for the right will seek to recoup that investment plus financing costs from the users and all that this will mean is higher shipping costs; not to cover the real costs of shipping but for the privilege of charging shippers more than the real costs warrant.

If we want to bring logistics costs down the best sort of port is one that charges users only the cost of amortising the construction of needed facilities and a reasonable operator's margin for getting boxes on boats.

That would be the real rock-bottom cost and we could get it by having as many berths as are needed for competition between them to bring the fees down to a level where the surplus value of having a right to own and operate a berth is no more than one dollar. Any more would make the profits too slim to justify buying that right.

It is certainly not the way things are the moment. At a rough guess, the charges at the Kwai Chung container port are something like HK$15 billion more a year than a reasonable cost for amortisation and operation, with that amount split between the port and the shipping companies.

Call it less than HK$15 billion if you will - some will - but it is certainly in the billions and, what is more, it allows the Shenzhen ports to charge similar high fees and the Shenzhen authorities to extract money from other monopoly dodges like cross-border goods vehicle licences. They sit on the only gateway to Hong Kong. They can charge what they like.

Which brings up the point about the bridge. Let Zhuhai in on the game and suddenly Shenzhen has some competition. In fact, there is no reason to leave it at Zhuhai alone. Get every local authority in the Pearl River Delta competing for access to Hong Kong and just watch those extortions practised at the border come tumbling down.

Then get a new line of ports competing for the business and watch their terminal handling charges come tumbling down too, down until they represent only the cost of putting boxes on boats and the right to do so is worth only one dollar. That is the way to make our logistics industries truly efficient.

Please, ye gods of the Planning Department, please keep at least South Lantau free of these ports and I shall be willing to put up with losing some of my favourite walking trails for the undeniable benefit it will bring us.

Email Jake van der Kamp at jakeva@scmp.com.

3. Lack of leadership skills promotes gloomy vision
Letters to the editor, Sunday Morning Post 24 November 2002

Your columnist Anne Forrest gave failing grades to Hong Kong’s leaders (“Time for doomsayers to ditch dirge”, Sunday Money, November 17). In complaining about them being prophets of doom, she quoted two recent events that are possibly applicable to maybe 5 percent of the population of nearly seven million.

Causal observation indicates that, for instance, Chai Wan, Wah Fu, Tuen Mun, Tin Shui Wai and Sheung Shui, among others, are not only geographically a long way from Armani’s new mega-store and the Hong Kong Stock exchange – especially since the penny-stocks debacle.

Now as it happens, the people in leadership positions in Hong Kong emanate either from central selection, the monopolistic business cartels, or both. Whereas, in times of economic adversity, political leaders with vision emerge, and in constituencies that practice majority suffrage, they form governments.

In these cases one can expect those four leadership skills (which your columnist identified) to be present in government leaders. Hong Kong is not in this category so it is no surprise that not only is a positive vision not present but it is also not talked about. Gloom and doom therefore prevail.

D. Castledine
Kowloon




Home Page | About Us | Our Services | News Updates | Events Calendar | Morning Briefing | Partners
Top of Page | Contact Us | Site Search | Legal Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
© 2001 SKYLINE Technologies Limited. All Rights Reserved.